Kindof makes it even more sad that Nintendo users didn't support their games at all and basically drove them away like they did to 99% of other third party devs.

Actually, Nintendo users supported Treyarch's COD games for years, hence why they made 8 of them on Nintendo consoles; one every year from 2005 to 2013. (Except 2007)

If they were not profitable, they would not have kept making them for so long.

Wii U has a slower CPU than PS3/360 but its hardware is more capable overall due to its more modern GPU and larger RAM.

BO2 is a game that frequently throws large numbers of NPCs into play at once, hence its core design is more suited to PS3/360, in the same way that more GPU/Memory bound games like Need for Speed and Trine 2 are a better fit for Wii U. It's also a game built on 6 years of optimization to PS3/360's hardware, but a launch title for Wii U.

Personally, I'll take the Wii U version of BO2 for the pointer controls alone. Hell, I bought MW1/W@W/BO/MW3 on Wii despite owning an Xbox 360, because I prefer the pointer that much.

 I'm referencing the fact that CoD games have never sold well on Nintendo consoles, or at least not as well as they have on Xbox and PS consoles. The only time I saw any different was CoD3, but that was back in the days where a lot of the wrong people were tricked into buying Wii's. 

They clearly sold well enough to turn a profit, as they kept making them year after year for almost a decade.

yeah im pretty sure Treyarch was told to make these games by Activision. That dev team doesnt have that much influence

Treyarch is not an independent studio. If anything you should thank Activision for the ports.

They sold at around 1 million each. That's more than a lot of Nintendo games.

I still play black ops 2 and ghosts with a friend. I play on the pad and he plays on the tv, it's great fun.

I appreciate Activision calling the shots, but I also appreciate Treyarch for getting it done and doing an admirable job.