Soundwave said:
They are not "equal" in character in my eyes, Clinton has given 30+ years of her life to public service, served as a state senator, served as a two term first lady under what I think most Americans would consider a prosperous presidency, marched in the civil rights movement, etc. etc. In reality I think she is one of the most experienced people to ever run for the office. Trump is maybe the most morally bankrupt person to ever run for the presidency. It's hard to debate Trump's "policy" positions because most of it is bullshit which he will flip flop on. Case in point, he whines about China this, China that, trade deficet this and that (something he's been parroting since the 1980s by the way, only then he was blaming Japan). Of course America has a trade deficet with other countries. They consume more goods than anyone else in the world because they are the largest consumer market. The average Chinese household doesn't have 2-3 cars, 3-4 TVs, washer/dryer, and a mountain full of other shit. Most average Chinese people are working just to have food on the table. Of course we are going to have a trade deficet with them, they work themselves to death for pennies on the dollar so we can buy a bunch of cheap crap to feel happy about ourselves for 10 minutes. This is the part Trump won't tell you because it doesn't sound so good. Personally too I think the "she's a politican" line is so incredibly stupid. What exactly do you think the person nominated is going to be doing? They are going into the world of POLITICS. Hate to break it to people, but that's the reality of it. It's like saying you don't like your soccer team so you're going to have basketball players play instead ... well yeah, lets see how that goes when they have to play soccer. I understand there is frustration against the "system", but Trump is the (very) wrong answer to the right question. |
I am sorry but having a well payed job that you choose to do that does not endanger your life is not serving your country in sacrifice. Again I dont agree with career politicians. It was not the intent of the founding fathers to have career politicians, nor are they sacrificng anything. Let me know when chooses to giver all her money to the people she says she cares about and live off 30-60k a year, Than I will consider her sacrifice. She can stop using private jets as well, and get rid of her 10k dresses and clothes. Sacrifice my butt
He has said what he would do with china, he would take them to town on their currency manipulation, he would raise tarrifs when needed to bring jobs back to america. Yes we are the biggest consumers, doesnt mean we have to consume stuff made in other countries it can be made here too. He is against the TPP, and NAFTA, basically the outsourcing of jobs. He is for a more streamlined less convulted tax code (easy for rich to abuse complicated systems). And most of all he is the only candidate that has mentioned states rights, which I am for as well. Government should be as close to those governemed as possible, and not removed to some far away place where as Hillary said it "I am removed from the life common people live" polticians run things.
I am a firm believer in America first. I am fine with Tarriffs and protectionism. We should protect our economey just as we proteect our safety, they go hand in hand. We must start being producers again and not servicers. The only way to do that is to stop other countries from under cutting us on jobs since they are ok slaving away for mere food to stay alive. Its funny that liberals want everyone in the US to be fed and have healthcare but are fine with jobs going over seas for being to be slave labor, doesnt that seem imperialistic and unkind. Americans getting rich off the back of others? We should do it ourselves and help bring up poor people her and set the example the workd should live by, not plunder the poor countries of the world and take their resources.