By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Donald Trump sex talk video/audio leaked

drkohler on 09 October 2016
thranx said:
Actions will always speak louder than words. Can't get any worse than the inaction of hillary in protecting our ambassadors and soldiers.

Are you really that dumb? Is it really the job of a foreign secretary to "protect our ambassadors?"

Do you know which US party cut the US budgets for exactly this kind of task? You may find a rather confusiing answer to that question. But I doubt you will understand it, it seems you main job here is bashing HC.



Around the Network
bunchanumbers on 09 October 2016
thranx said:
bunchanumbers said:

Straw man. Bill is being brought up because they can't really throw the shit on Hillary directly. So the goal is to throw a mountain on Bill and hope that some of the splashback lands on her.

Why are we talking about something that was said 10 years ago and doesnt involve Trumps policies?

 

Why is Bill on the campaign trail for Hillary? If she doesnt apporve of how he acts why would she let him campaign for her? Doesnt that speak to character like this video? We can tlak about immigration, foreign policy, and the economy instead.

Not really. Because if we go to who is campaigning for who, then we can bring up how a dude with russian ties was running Trumps campaign. I would actually love to hear policy from Trump, but all we usually hear about is how we're losing, we're building a wall, stop and frisk, and how great Putin is.



thranx on 09 October 2016
drkohler said:
thranx said:
Actions will always speak louder than words. Can't get any worse than the inaction of hillary in protecting our ambassadors and soldiers.

Are you really that dumb? Is it really the job of a foreign secretary to "protect our ambassadors?"

Do you know which US party cut the US budgets for exactly this kind of task? You may find a rather confusiing answer to that question. But I doubt you will understand it, it seems you main job here is bashing HC.

"The Secretary of State, and by extension, the Chief of Mission (COM), are responsible for developing and implementing security policies and programs that provide for the protection of all U.S. Government personnel (including accompanying dependents) on official duty abroad."

http://www.state.gov/m/ds/about/overview/c9004.htm

Yes I am that dumb i guess. stupid me.

If Hillary couldnt make it happen than how could she make it happen now



sundin13 on 09 October 2016

bunchanumbers said:

I would actually love to hear policy from Trump, but all we usually hear about is how we're losing, we're building a wall, stop and frisk, and how great Putin is.

I think the reason why Trump so rarely talks policy is because his policy is kind of a mess. It seems like all of the pillars of his campaign (policy-wise) are shaky at best and self destructive at worst. 



drkohler on 09 October 2016
thranx said:
drkohler said:

Are you really that dumb? Is it really the job of a foreign secretary to "protect our ambassadors?"

Do you know which US party cut the US budgets for exactly this kind of task? You may find a rather confusiing answer to that question. But I doubt you will understand it, it seems you main job here is bashing HC.

"The Secretary of State, and by extension, the Chief of Mission (COM), are responsible for developing and implementing security policies and programs that provide for the protection of all U.S. Government personnel (including accompanying dependents) on official duty abroad."

http://www.state.gov/m/ds/about/overview/c9004.htm

Yes I am that dumb i guess. stupid me.

Obviously. Since you think there was nothing before HC, she should have developed the whole thing.

Again, which party cut the funding for exactly those programs?



Around the Network
thranx on 09 October 2016
drkohler said:
thranx said:

"The Secretary of State, and by extension, the Chief of Mission (COM), are responsible for developing and implementing security policies and programs that provide for the protection of all U.S. Government personnel (including accompanying dependents) on official duty abroad."

http://www.state.gov/m/ds/about/overview/c9004.htm

Yes I am that dumb i guess. stupid me.

Obviously. Since you think there was nothing before HC, she should have developed the whole thing.

Again, which party cut the funding for exactly those programs?

Can she do the job or not? Pass the buck on I guess. Not my fault, someone elses fault, no personal responsibility.

She had 3 years and to do her job before the attack. But I am sure there is some other reason she couldnt do the job.



AsGryffynn on 10 October 2016
SpokenTruth said:
Slimebeast said:
I don't get it. It's wrong for a man to wanna fuck women now??

No, but it is wrong for a man to assert himself onto a women that doesn't want it.  Would you be cool if trump walked in and grabbed your mom, wife or daugher by the vagina?

Panama said:
Using a private conversation from years ago to try and win her votes? In all honesty it just makes Hilary look desperate and petty.

She didn't reveal it nor bring it up at the debate.

thranx said:

could have been avoided by listening to said amabassador when he asked for more security from the state department but was denied.

He was denied because Republicans cut funding for embassy security for the previous few years. 

Hillary told Republicans’ that their proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security.”

Paul Ryan and other House Republicans in 2009 pushed a bill that would cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds that would have been allocated for 300 more diplomatic security positions. They cut it by $128 million in 2011 and $331 million in 2012.

But sure, let's only blame Hillary.

The implication of his message specifically was they didn't mind because money boy! 



Soundwave on 10 October 2016
SpokenTruth said:
Slimebeast said:
I don't get it. It's wrong for a man to wanna fuck women now??

No, but it is wrong for a man to assert himself onto a women that doesn't want it.  Would you be cool if trump walked in and grabbed your mom, wife or daugher by the vagina?

Panama said:
Using a private conversation from years ago to try and win her votes? In all honesty it just makes Hilary look desperate and petty.

She didn't reveal it nor bring it up at the debate.

thranx said:

could have been avoided by listening to said amabassador when he asked for more security from the state department but was denied.

He was denied because Republicans cut funding for embassy security for the previous few years. 

Hillary told Republicans’ that their proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security.”

Paul Ryan and other House Republicans in 2009 pushed a bill that would cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds that would have been allocated for 300 more diplomatic security positions. They cut it by $128 million in 2011 and $331 million in 2012.

But sure, let's only blame Hillary.

Yeah b ... bu ... but I heard Hilary killed those people in the embassy personally. With a ring forged with the Dark Lord Sauron in the pits of Mount Doom. 

It's true folkes. I've had people look into it, you wouldn't believe what they're saying. People are talking about it. Something's going on folkes. I don't know what, but something is definitely going on. 



tokilamockingbrd on 11 October 2016
SpokenTruth said:
tokilamockingbrd said:

Look the comments are not good, however... they were private. I would wager that just about anyone in the US could be made to be an ass if their dumbest statements were published for all to see. 

Meanwhile back at the ranch, Wikileaks emails showed an additional 3 felonies Hilary is implacated in. 

They had this clip for a while. They dropped it when Wikileaks released some really bad stuff on Hilary. Its a smart move honestly. They have people distacted from another 3 reasons to put Hilary in prison. 

You just...see bold, underlined and italicized text.

Also, shouldn't we hold our presidential candidates to a higher standard than Bro Banter?

lol, ok how about this rule.

Rule XBII- If you automatically disqualify a negative attack on your canidate of choice because you 1st attacked their canidate of choice. If due to this set of circumstances  you believe your argument holds precedent, you automatically lose that argument. 

It is fun making up arbitrary rules that you can use to claim victory in an argument without actually having to defend said argument. 



psn- tokila

add me, the more the merrier.

ratuscafoarterea on 11 October 2016
FIT_Gamer said:
thranx said:

Sling that mud, At least we know Bill slept with someone have his age, while in a postition of power. Yes we can guess about Trump, but have facts about Bill, who Hillary supports

Why do people keep bringing up Bill Clinton? He isn't running for president. Who gives a fuck what he does? 

You realize that Bill Clinton is the husband of Hillary Clinton, and by sticking up with him after the affairs he had and the lies that he said, she is basically agreeing with his actions (actions, not words). You realize that, don’t you? I can believe I have to point out such simple things to some of you, when you should be able to use your brains.

Edit

Just to prove how wrong you are, you basically say that a guy like Jeff Bush is clean, even if he has greatly benefited from the murderous wars that the Bush family has been part of.