By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Crowd is completely blown away by the 4K HDR graphics of the PS4 Pro

Tabular on 02 October 2016
Ruler said:
so whos getting the Pro?

Pro is an obvious choice this year imo. I've got one on order. And a PS VR. And a platinum wireless headset. Going to be fun. I believe every game going forward will be best on pro - even for 1080p owners. 



"These are the highest quality pixels that anybody has seen"

Around the Network
Ruler on 03 October 2016
Tabular said:
Ruler said:
so whos getting the Pro?

Pro is an obvious choice this year imo. I've got one on order. And a PS VR. And a platinum wireless headset. Going to be fun. I believe every game going forward will be best on pro - even for 1080p owners. 

cool :)



Why i left PC gaming

 

(2015) Question for PS4 owners: if the situation would be reverse? would you still play on PS4?

(2015) The "I don't care PS4 is the most powerful console" thread

LivingMetal on 03 October 2016

Just waiting on the PS4 Pro bundle announcement. (If there will be any...)



Kerotan on 03 October 2016
Ruler said:
so whos getting the Pro?

I'm getting it.  

 

But haven't pre ordered yet mainly because I'm lazy and secondly I want to see if they announce any bundles. 



LivingMetal on 03 October 2016
Ruler said:
so whos getting the Pro?



Around the Network
Ruler on 03 October 2016
LivingMetal said:
Just waiting on the PS4 Pro bundle announcement. (If there will be any...)

what kind of bundle FF15?



Why i left PC gaming

 

(2015) Question for PS4 owners: if the situation would be reverse? would you still play on PS4?

(2015) The "I don't care PS4 is the most powerful console" thread

Arkaign on 03 October 2016

Wrong thread



Trunkin on 03 October 2016

So I just went to Best Buy to take a look at their 4K HDR displays... I think I'm gonna have to retract a lot of the shit I've said about 4K. It is noticeably sharper than 1080p, especially when you see them back to back. Even the non-HDR displays looked very nice. I dunno wtf is wrong with Walmart's 4K TVs that they look so shit. Shame I won't be able to afford one of these displays any time soon.



Lawlight on 03 October 2016
Pemalite said:

Okay. So.
1) Eyes don't see the world in pixels. You can have vision that exceeds 20/20.

2) Eyes don't see the world in terms of "frames per second".
3) There is little sense in making a 64-core CPU. CPU's aren't meant for highly parallel tasks, that's the job of the GPU, keep them serialised. - Also the frequency they operate isn't their performance.
4) You will not have System Ram on a 1024-bit bus, like. Ever. It requires far to many traces on the motherboard to make it economically feasible.

This diagram doesn't seem right. You can see the difference between 720p and 1080p on a 15 inch screen at 3m away?



Pemalite on 03 October 2016
Lawlight said:
Pemalite said:

Okay. So.
1) Eyes don't see the world in pixels. You can have vision that exceeds 20/20.

2) Eyes don't see the world in terms of "frames per second".
3) There is little sense in making a 64-core CPU. CPU's aren't meant for highly parallel tasks, that's the job of the GPU, keep them serialised. - Also the frequency they operate isn't their performance.
4) You will not have System Ram on a 1024-bit bus, like. Ever. It requires far to many traces on the motherboard to make it economically feasible.

This diagram doesn't seem right. You can see the difference between 720p and 1080p on a 15 inch screen at 3m away?

It is actually correct.

However it's more of a guideline.
Human vision can exceed 20/20 for example... What it's trying to say is that you get diminishing returns after those points.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--