torok said: It's because if it is considerably weaker, it won't get ports of 3rd party games. If it is at least OG XB1 level, it will be good to go, no issues. Anyway, Nintendo didn't seem able to get full 3rd party support anymore. The relationship between both sides seems to broken and I also think that the gamers that indeed wanted 3rd party support already moved to other platforms years ago. So I see NX more as a console made by Nintendo to run Nintendo games. I think they will create a cheap console focused on their own software, so gamers that already have a PS4 or X1 will feel compelled to buy it because it's simply pretty cheap, portable and has Nintendo games. Making an expensive and powerful console means that people will probably not have money to buy it and keep a PS4/X1 and it's a but insane to try to go attacking platforms that already have 3 years of games and install base. |
I think that's a valid option. Not the only one, but maybe the safest one of the two ways I see for Nintendo:
1- A new SNES: say what you want, but most of true gamers dream about a console that sums Nintendo IPs and equal or more power than the competition. Not just for the power, but for what you can do with it. SNES had STRONG third party support and incredible first party games. If it's marketed in the right way, it could cust as much as the competition and still sell, at least, better than the X1. It would need strong third party support, a strong online network, variety of first party titles (not just Mario and Zelda, it would need good new IPs and new games from series like Metroid and F-Zero in the way that the fans want it, not Star Fox Zero way) and a tradicional controller. If it's made the right way, it would kick Microsoft out of the way and Nintendo would battle Sony head-to-head in a future next generation.
2- A new Wii: what makes Wii so brilliant was the sum of innovative ways to play, good price and exclusive games. You couldn't had the same experience in any other console in that generation (at least, before Kinect and PSMove) and that made the Wii steal the show. The trick part is: it has to be unique and cheap. The rumours point to that way. And it could work, with a good amount of great games and a price that convince X1 and PS4 owners to have a second console and, more than that, convince people that don't like games that much (casuals, for saying) that it a good valour for tons of fun. More than keep Nintendo alive, it could be responsible for keep the idea of dedicated devices for playing alive in this world of consoles that are becoming more and more like a PC.
It all just depends on what Nintendo consider was the worst mistake with the Wii U. If it was power, online and third party support (like much of the gamers think), go the first way. If it was high cost and lack of enough first party support (like Nintendo fans usually think), go the second way.
I'm a Nintendo fan since I was born and have all consoles from NES to Wii, from GBC to 3DS. Wii U never convinced me and when you live in a country that a console cust twice a minimum wage, it's not possible to afford a console that isn't good enough. I chose a X1 and I'm pretty happy with it. Excellent online service, good exclusives and the majority of third party games. The first option is my dream, the second one is what I think Nintendo will do.