Raistline said:
They did not say that Every game will get the Pro patch. It will be up to the devleopers whether or not they wish to add it and what features they wish to add. They have a choice to enhance the visuals, add 4K, add HDR, or whatever other possible enhancements they choose. The games that will have Pro features will be clearly labled on the PS4 store and on the packaging of the PS4 game.
They said that all games that come out after the release date that wish to take advantage of the PRO features need to do it by X date, most likely so that the features can be verfied by Sony so that the games can be labled correctly.
They repeated many times that it is not required by any game during the post show interviews.
|
In the leaked documents, which we can confirm is real now cause it got everything about the pro dead right, it clearly stated that every game released from October will ship with a Pro mode.
What Sony has "repeatedly" said will be up to devs is how they choose to use that Pro mode. But it also said that on the Pro all games must at the very least run at 1080p and a framerate no worse than the base PS4.
Now to think that a dev will make a pro version of their game (with higher rez and better assets) then just somehow take all the extra stuff out for those playing it on a 1080p tv.... is just ridiculous. At the very least you get super sampling if the game was rendered natively on the Pro at anything higher than 1080p. Basically, everything added or improved on the Pro mode will get carried over to a 1080p tv. I don't even believe this has to be explained.
konnichiwa said:
True you don't need to upgrade but people feel pushed into it. People with a PS4 will pay the same amount for their games but get not the same experience as PS4 pro players.
Btw the Xbox 360/PS3 were powerfull cheap consoles, while PS4/Xbox one were cheap mediocre powerfull consoles, they easy could made the consoles more powerfull but as their right...they choose to go for the profits. And now they can sell another console it is kind of brilliant from a financial point.
|
I don't understand how or why you would say the PS4/XB1 were cheap mediocre consoles. But I'm just gonna ignore that and not get into it.
What you said about paying for the same game but getting less of an experience is just bullshit. That's like saying a PC gamer feels cheated csuse he pays for the same game but the person that has a GPU that cost 3 times more than his GPU gets a better gaming experience.
In 2013, the best $400 console they could make was what we got. Making it more powerful and selling it at a massive loss was not a route they were willing to take. But even at that, they still have u the best all round package you could get for $400.
In 2016, that is the PS4pro. If the PS4 cost $300 and gives you what can be considered a $300 expericne today. If you want better performance then you pay for the current $400 box. Simple as that.
Because you spent $400 3yrs ago doesn't mean the world sits still.... but answer me this; take FF15, so what you are basically saying is that it would have been ok if EVERYONE got the same variable rez game at mostly 30fps and that you only have a problem with that because there are some that could choose to spend some more money today and play the game with higher settings than what you are getting on your 3yr old PS4?