So if a console is able to do 4K imagine what it will do at 1080P / 60.

Welcome to his thread?

No. Welcome to your way of doing things. You're always generalizing and bring up Sony gamers whenever you can in your crap as if they stole your candy when you were a toddler.

All the OP demonstrated is he doesn't get what a resolution is.

Intersting. Please enlighten me. Unless of course this is just a silly attempt at trying to sound smart. 

Some on PC are fine with 4k 30fps and some think 4K is only acceptable with 60fps.

Not really sure why this thread is trying to spin it in something else.

Just watch videos of reviews for the 1080 and read the comments. There is a huge amount of PC gamers who say they won't upgrade their rig as long as they won't get a GPU which will let them play most games with 4K and 60fps.

A lot of PC gamers complain about how 4K is still useless to them and how hey will only play in 1440p because they need 60fps.

Don't try to let it look as if PC gamers are all the same who change their opinion just to fit their agenda. Most PC gamers know pretty well what they want and prefer and sure, some care more about fps and some more about resolution. Some only want to play on ultra and some say that lower settings are also fine if they reach more frames with it.

That's the nice thing with PC gaming, you can decide what you prefer and you don't have to accept what the dev decides for you (well, some try to even on PC)

You are not alone in this, its one of the reasons why I think Neo and Scorpio are stupid ideas.

4k is expensive however it is affordable for premium buyers. Im not rich yet im buying a 4k PC at the end of the year. Sure if you want to run 4k at 60 with Ultra settings its going to drain your PC however you dont have to run 4k with Ultra settings. Consoles run 1080p with mediun settings and if 1080p is good enough for medium settings than why is 4k any different? If consoles ran there games at 720p im sure they can run all there games on high or even ultra settings yet many console gamers tend to prefer 1080p with lower settings over 720p with higher settings. How could we forget about the Battle of 1080p at the launch.

Either way it's not cheap to run 4k but its not out of reach for premuim gaming customers. The way ill run my games at 4k/60 with my future PC will be switching off AA and Hairworks or lowering the shadow settings. It will still look amazing especially in HDR.

What's to get? If you want more of one, you have to sacrifice from the other.

4K is great for non-gaming. For gaming, I don't care for it as much but plenty of people still do and it's no rare sight to see people arguing about it.

Well dude you gotta remember that this is the internet. Yes they are loud (VERY LOUD) but ultimately they are the minority. Not everyone does it but the few bad apples in the so called "PC Master Race" can easily be spotted. Hell, you can spot a couple on this site but they should just be ignored. It's best to debate things like 4K with people who can listen to reason.

I agree that Neo and Scorpio are bad idea only because all there doing if offering a resolution bump. With PCs you get alot more than just resolution and also the choice between playing a game at 30 or 60. Thats why i shook my head at this gen of consoles when all i heard was 1080p. Theres alot more to do to  visuals than more pixels