Like I wrote, Nvidia relly can't say anything that will disproves eurogamers infos, maybe only if they say loud and clear, we dont have any involvement with Nintendo hardware. :)

Yes after GoldenEye there is not much to talk about when comes to games that apealled to the same demographic.

From all the things I've heard it seems Nintendo stopped making those type of games delibrately, not sure about the reasons but I'm sure Miyamoto is one of the people who pushed for this.

And yes Nintendo don't really care about what the western audience wants. If they did they would be making there own FPS shooter to take on the likes of BF and CoD wether you like those games or not they sell.

Edit: and the missing sports games from EA and 2K doesn't help

Well this just sounds like sorry ass planning on Nintendo's part. Seems more like a "whoops, we forgot to send out the dev kits" if the dev kits use them anyways. They could have been a stop gap a year ago.

I personally think te NX was meant come out late next year but Nintendo pushed the release forward because of poor Wii U sales and stagnating 3DS sales

Fair enough, but a lot of people also think it was pushed back from holiday this year, making it even worse. 

Heck, they could still always push it back.

I did check your post history, and you have been in 2 NX discussions in the last 3 months (both of which from just the last couple days).

In neither of the 2 threads have you actually explained anything, you started out by saying it will fail because 3rd parties wont support an underpowered device.

It was then brought to your attention that this is not only the Wii U successor, but also the 3DS successor, which is by farrrrrr the most underpowered system on the market and gets decent support so power alone does not determine support.

You havent countered that with anything, all of your responses since that point have been things like, "well  it doesnt personally appeal to me" or "i dont see it happening" or "hopefully they make a believer out of me".

Thats what i mean by you havent explained anything, your initial post had reasons but they were countered by showing how being underpowered does not in and of itself amount to poor sales or poor 3rd party support.

It may come off like im being hostile but i promise thats not my intention, im just trying to have a discussion and when someone has a strong opinion on something, like saying "it WILL fail", they are kinda expected to have reasons for thinking that way.

Like I said, the support will likely come from a combination of Japanese, indie & family friendly titles which are all 3 categories that Nintendo gets solid support from. Basic western support similar to what Wii U had initially would certainly be welcome and would give NX a pretty well rounded library.

Its not that Nintendo cant release a powerful device with the intention of getting PS4/XB1 ports, its that they wont and shouldnt. Why would people buy a device released in the middle of the generation to play games that are on devices they already own? They wont and it will then be Nintendo games that are the only major differentiator.......so basically Wii U, a device late to the party designed to get ports with a few big exclusives each year.

There are certainly many benefits for gamers by going with a unified system. One of which is being able to play all your games on a single device instead of having to buy 2 seperate devices to get full access to the Nintendo ecosystem.

For example, lets say someone is interested in Fire Emblem, Pokemon, Animal Crossing, Monster Hunter, Splatoon, Mario Maker, Bayonetta & Xenoblade X. That person would need to spend $500 in hardware to play those 8 games and would have to own 2 seperate devices and they couldnt play half those games on the go or the other half on the TV. They may pass on getting either device, but if they had the option to buy a single $250 device that played all 8 of those games on the TV or on the go, wouldnt they be more likely to go with that option? I certainly think so.

Another reason is that Nintendo can cut down on redundant titles which opens them up to resurrecting older franchises and making new IP, giving them the potential to diversify their library and a more diverse library means the potential to get new players.

Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if that happened

I hope you are right... I never liked anything about the Wii, hated the tablet controller on the Wii-U and disliked the 3d option on the 3DS, even tough I've owned nearly every console released by Nintendo since 1985, After the Gamecube (and DS for handhelds) they have really lost me as a "hardcore" fan. I am always looking at Nintendo but buying their consoles is something that is deffenitely not a sure thing anymore, since I've mostly migrated to PC these days.

The NX would need to have 3th party support, preferably be in the x86 architecture type and have a large storage capability to download games instead of physical copies, and some more things, I just want something that feels like its made for the future :)

Anyway, long rant, but I cannot wait till we see the console and I do hope they spare no money in making that fast-streamlined gaming experience with good third party support and online experience!

People really underestimate Howard Lincoln's contributions to Nintendo in particular. 

When EA said they wouldn't support the N64, he went personally to EA, set up a meeting and after that EA agreed to support the N64. Does Nintendo have anyone like that today? Nope. 

NOA successfully negotiated the rights for Star Wars exclusive games in the 90s, which was huge, Star Wars at that time was probably even bigger than it is now. 

Things like Kobe Bryant and Ken Griffey Jr. NBA and MLB games all under NOA, hell in the 90s Nintendo had DMA Design (the future developers of Grand Theft Auto III) as a 2nd party partner. I think Miyamoto did not like GTA3 so it was not allowed on the N64.