I'll be disappointed if NX launches in 2017 and is weaker than a console that came out 4 years earlier. Developers struggling to put their games on the system will more than likely lead to those games not making it to the console.
I'll be disappointed if NX launches in 2017 and is weaker than a console that came out 4 years earlier. Developers struggling to put their games on the system will more than likely lead to those games not making it to the console.
Cloudman said: I thought this was confirmed some time ago? Or did people think they only meant the handheld version was coming to the NX? |
Well it was obvious some time ago, it was never confirmed though.
Mbolibombo said:
Well it was obvious some time ago, it was never confirmed though. |
Ah, that's right. I think they strongly hinted it when they announced the game.
Dance my pretties!
The Official Art Thread - The Official Manga Thread - The Official Starbound Thread
Soundwave said: Good News: DQXI on NX is a go. That's great news actually. Bad News: It doesn't sound like its a port of the PS4 version (or 3DS version) ... but that may indicate the NX does not have the hardware power to port the PS4 build. |
No, it just indicates you're retarded.
Soundwave said:
Starting to think NX is basically just a souped up Wii U level of performance. Would be a bit dissapointing since I think they can do more with mobile tech than that, but oh well. I think Nintendo is going to go hard after mobile/tablet gamers with the NX, it's not meant to compete with the PS4/XB1. |
You can't start doing something you're not capable of.
Soundwave said:
Yeah I'd love for that to be the case, but I don't think so, heh. MCV's source said between a PS3 and PS4, so that could mean more like a PS3 in raw horsepower with some tricks/more modern architecture to maybe "sell" the look of PS4-ish graphics in some situations. |
It only means you're ridiculous. Doesn't matter if you believe this nonsense or know it's BS and pretends to believe it.
Hehehe
Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever
Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe
Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor
Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile
Hahahaha. Like why the fuck are you even mad at me? Go to Eurogamaer and MCV and IGN and Wall Street Journal's offices and throw your 10-year-old temper tantrum at them, lol, they're the ones running the report (all verified by their own sources and by the way MCV's source told them he actually saw a game running on the system so it's not just a controller). It's not my story I'm only commenting on what is being reported by the gaming press.
Miyamotoo said:
Well Wii U is already dead, not to mentioned 2017. |
Which is why I'm going to be VERY wary of the NX. Nintendo have a good history of screwing over their customers with overpriced hardware, only to abandon it prematurely and chase a new concept.
memoryman3 said:
Which is why I'm going to be VERY wary of the NX. Nintendo have a good history of screwing over their customers with overpriced hardware, only to abandon it prematurely and chase a new concept. |
That isn't true, actually only Wii U and 3DS were overpriced, also they gaving full suport around 4-5 years and that very close to usual life cycle of generation of consoles.
Miyamotoo said:
That isn't true, actually only Wii U and 3DS were overpriced, also they gaving full suport around 4-5 years and that very close to usual life cycle of generation of consoles. |
The Wii was a moderately overclocked $99.99 GameCube (the GameCube had been $99 for *three* years by 2006 to boot), that they sold for $250, the additional cost largely being a plastic controller that probably cost $10/pop to mass produce and an laughably small 512MB internal storage (remember Nintendo's solution to this for many years was to simply delete games and use the "fridge" method).
I would say that was overpriced. The XBox 360 was a full generation upgrade for $50 more available a full year earlier.
Yes the system did have some good games (like Mario Galaxy), but that doesn't excuse the hardware.
The GameCube at $199.99 just five years prior was *full* generation upgrade over the Nintendo 64 and even better than the Playstation 2.
The Wii U at least was also a full generation upgrade on the Wii with many multiple times more storage.
Soundwave said:
The Wii was a moderately overclocked $99.99 GameCube (the GameCube had been $99 for *three* years by 2006 to boot), that they sold for $250, the additional cost largely being a plastic controller that probably cost $10/pop to mass produce. I would say that was overpriced. The XBox 360 was a full generation upgrade for $50 more available a full year earlier. Yes the system did have some good games (like Mario Galaxy), but that doesn't excuse the hardware. The GameCube at $199.99 just five years prior was *full* generation upgrade over the Nintendo 64 and even better than the Playstation 2. |
Comparing to GC was overpriced, compared to competition was not. Also you need to cost of new technology. If Wii relly wan overpriced never wouldnt sell 100m, one of main reason why Wii sold so much is afordible price for mass market with $249.