By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Digital Foundry: No Man's Sky framerate and performance test (PS4)

patronmacabre on 09 August 2016

Well, I'm glad got this game for PC then.



Around the Network
Goodnightmoon on 09 August 2016

Ugh, those landing moments made me want to puke, at least that's only a minority of the game and the rest is stable.



COKTOE on 09 August 2016

It looks really good overall. And within the context of what the game is trying to do, it looks great. I would hope for performance boosting updates in the future, but if they never come, this will more than suffice.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

mymuro on 09 August 2016

Pretty terrible with those graphic. They even put out a 60fps PS4 trailer just to trick ppl into thinking its a 60fps game.



Super_Boom on 09 August 2016
onionberry said:

so solid 30 fps is impressive now... wow. not hating, just saying. ¯_(シ)_/¯
Pinkie_pie said:

Funny how you think zelda botw is impressive when it runs at 30 fps. 
alternine said:

Its best to just ignore post like that man. Shes fishing.

All of you, stay on topic. Strawmen and personal shots are NOT okay.



NNID: Zephyr25 / PSN: Zephyr--25 / Switch: SW-4450-3680-7334

Around the Network
hunter_alien on 09 August 2016
onionberry said:
Pinkie_pie said:

Funny how you think zelda botw is impressive when it runs at 30 fps. 

I don't know what your point is but well, visually even breath of the wild looks better, also gameplay wise and everything else. This game is running at 14 fps sometimes, that's crazy when uncharted 4 looks way better and the framerate is solid. Also, the pop in and field of view is terrible.

To bad that the size of the map is similar like comparing some piss in the bucket with the ocean

 

OT: looks solid. Not my cup of tee, but I bet that many will enjoy this title



Vote the Mayor for Mayor!

GOWTLOZ on 09 August 2016
onionberry said:

so solid 30 fps is impressive now... wow. not hating, just saying. ¯_(シ)_/¯

 

 

 the game looks like a fun ride of exploration.

It is impressive for such a huge game. Not all games are so hardware intensive.



Guitarguy on 10 August 2016

Quite good for a CPU-intensive, voxel based engine that renders massive worlds with no loading and relies on heavy algorithms for creating procedurally generated planets. This is impressive for any current console.



TheTruthHurts! on 10 August 2016

Looks great, I will be picking it up on PC when it drops to $40 or less.



TallSilhouette on 10 August 2016
Guitarguy said:
Quite good for a CPU-intensive, voxel based engine that renders massive worlds with no loading and relies on heavy algorithms for creating procedurally generated planets. This is impressive for any current console.

Indeed. People getting so hung up on textures and comparing it to traditional games.