Hiku said:
Peh said:
I always hear people saying that europe shouldn't have taken so many refugees in and so on, but I never hear the alternative.
What would have you suggested during the masses of refugees coming into your country?
Shoot them? Sending them back to where they came from, which can also lead to their death? You know, if you are bind by law, that you take refugees in, and you've agreed to this terms, then it kinda makes this so called conept laws questionable which you agreed to obey in the first place.
|
I think a common suggestion is that neighbouring countries should be more open to taking refugees in. Instead they have extremely long waiting processes like 15 years in some cases. So it falls on other European countries to take most of them instead.
|
Well, that's obvious. But they just don't want to even if they had to like Poland. Poland argues that, they don't take them in, because they are a homogeneous country. Well, they are right. But why sign an agreement and don't comply with it? Take all the money from the EU to build up your country, get the advantages in economy and then say no, because they don't want to.
And the EU goes like, OK.