By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - No Man's Sky Doesn't Use Superformula

Haha, this thread is pure comedy.

Genicap is not suing Hello games.
The Telegraaf quoted some ICT lawyer (not Genicap) that there could be a case of patent infringement involving the Superformula.
Genicap did not patent a mathematical formula. They did get a software patent in 2004 for applications using a form of procedural generation including using the superformula. It's much broader than just that formula, software patents :/
However Johan Gielis from Genicap is simply interested in what Hello games has done since they mentioned experimenting with his superformula in an article in the NewYorker last year.
Turns out Hello games didn't use it at after all, yet is also interested in a discussion to share ideas.

Ok back to the cosby show on Sky.



Around the Network
hershel_layton said:
pokoko said:

Dutch company, British developer ... what am I missing?

Oh.

 

I'm just so used to seeing American companies suing each other that I immediately assumed it was an American company suing the developers of No Man's Sky

Beyond them not being American, I actually don't see the issue with a company getting a patent or trademark for an algorithm.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

vivster said:
Teeqoz said:
How can you even patent a mathematical formula?

The same way you can patent chemical formulas. Those things don't come from nothing and there is some serious work and thought behind it.

You can NOT patent a mathematical formula. You can only patent a novel way to use it, as math is not created but discovered.



Normchacho said:
hershel_layton said:

Oh.

 

I'm just so used to seeing American companies suing each other that I immediately assumed it was an American company suing the developers of No Man's Sky

Beyond them not being American, I actually don't see the issue with a company getting a patent or trademark for an algorithm.

Is it even worth it?

Imagine all the issues you'd stumble upon for patenting an algorithm. Sounds like a way to get headaches



 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12/22/2016- Made a bet with Ganoncrotch that the first 6 months of 2017 will be worse than 2016. A poll will be made to determine the winner. Loser has to take a picture of them imitating their profile picture.

hershel_layton said:
Normchacho said:

Beyond them not being American, I actually don't see the issue with a company getting a patent or trademark for an algorithm.

Is it even worth it?

Imagine all the issues you'd stumble upon for patenting an algorithm. Sounds like a way to get headaches

I mean, essentially it's a formula. Legally speaking I don't know if there would really be a difference between getting a patent for a mathmatical formula or a chemical one.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

Around the Network
aLkaLiNE said:
vivster said:

The same way you can patent chemical formulas. Those things don't come from nothing and there is some serious work and thought behind it.

You can NOT patent a mathematical formula. You can only patent a novel way to use it, as math is not created but discovered.

Ok. So this is true! Now, didn't Genicap say as part of their statement on the the issue, something along the lines of "Can you please show us how you were able to create a practical application using our long dormant formula?" I'm paraphrasing here, strictly from memory. It's more fun that way. At any rate, what does that leave Genicap with? A friendly meeting if they're very nice.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

Normchacho said:
hershel_layton said:

Is it even worth it?

Imagine all the issues you'd stumble upon for patenting an algorithm. Sounds like a way to get headaches

I mean, essentially it's a formula. Legally speaking I don't know if there would really be a difference between getting a patent for a mathmatical formula or a chemical one.

good point.



 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12/22/2016- Made a bet with Ganoncrotch that the first 6 months of 2017 will be worse than 2016. A poll will be made to determine the winner. Loser has to take a picture of them imitating their profile picture.

About sky... Those idiots sue everything with sky in it... MS skydrive bécane onedrive because of them....