By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Nvidia Titan X announced (1200$, 12GB of GDDR5X memory, 11 teraflops)

vivster said:
JEMC said:

Where did you get that 20% from?

The Titan X (2016) has 40% more cores and +80% higher memory bandwidth. I'd say that it will be at last something like 45-50% faster than the 1080.

40% is a bit very optimistic don't you think? Putting aside that it wouldn't make any business sense releasing a card that's 40% more powerful, games seem to favor clock over cores and this card has like 20% lower clock than the 1080. I'd say 30% is still optimistic at stock.

I forgot to take into consideration the lower frequencies of the Titan. Still, I'd be really surprised (and disappointed) if this new Titan isn't more than 30% faster than the 1080, and even more than that at 4K.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Around the Network

I'm not completely sold on it yet. I guess I'll wait for the computing benchmarks to decide if I'll get two of these or two 1080ti.



Netyaroze said:

Still not the maximum thats possible on 16nm 25% more clock and chip can get bigger too bet we will see 20 Tflops on 16nm in the next years.

I like the way you think.  And most likely, you are right.



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!

eva01beserk said:
Does anybody know the diiference in adoption of 970 to 980 to 980ti to titan x?

According to Steam Survey 5:1:1:0.?

970 is more than 5 percent, 980 and 980 Ti each around 1 percent and the Titan X less than 0.2 percent of the surveyed PCs.