drkohler said: There is only a minor problem with this "leak": AMD never launched engineering Jaguar cores at 14/16nm. There is no die-shrinking possible 28->14nm, this essentially requires a complete redesign (costing between $100M to $150M...). Why would anyone want to (=Sony,MS) redesign a cpu that was outdated several years ago, when better stuff (Zen lite amongst it) was already in the works? |
Umm, let's see... Binary compatability with existing CPU optimizations? Leading to reduced cross-development costs?
Yes, you obviously give up the performance gains from a new CPU architecture, but there are larger potential concerns than that.
And this is exactly what was reported in Eurogamer/ other press reportage on PS4NEO up to date.
Not to say that they shouldn't/can't aim higher for that, and that IMHO, CPU architecture update is acceptable for devs to swallow.
NVM that if MS also adopts Zen with Scorpio, Sony also doing so won't actually result in more CPU arch optimizations...
In fact, with Scorpio set to adopt same memory arch as PS4 (broadly), there will be a reduction in system arch models to begin with.
In the short term that doesn't help with existing XBone/PS4.0 base, but moving forward the arch differences would just be very minor.
But re-engineering Jaguar for 14nm FinFET would make sense if they prioritized CPU optimization binary compatability. Just saying.