I mean, isn't the end of war and ultimute transparancy what we all want in the free world? 

What does it matter if countries are renamed as states if they still hold sovereignty? The majority of "Western world" people are already wage slaves, the banks already own us, the police in (most countries) will still turn from protectors into minions of the militery in times of unrest and disaster. Nothing changes but in this case war may decrease as a move away from leaning on a militery economy. The intelligence community (10,000 strong in the US alone) will slowly fall away. There will be no need for warfare when trade routes are open and the only enemies to fight will be closed nation states such as North Korea.

At least this way the rich folk and the corporations won't push for militery actions against countries that don't agree with their money making agenda and possibly leave to war.

In my opinion Putin is correct and war is coming. The world reserve currency (dollor) will be replaced with gold, giving power to the east. The US will enter marshal law and this will destabalised the entire western world. The finncial crisis of 2008 was only a flesh would that the global banks confined to the EU which they couldn't treat, yet only postpone become a gangrenous  mess for the west.

After stuxnet unleashed who knows what cyber warfare is going on, unseen but one thing is blatently obvious and that actually warfare is on its way and if the world can agree on a one world system of government it may avert disaster. Maybe its a case of fucked if we do, fucked if we don't but I sure hope its a "do".

Tin foil hat not needed. Please take a look at the state of the world on a global scale, economically and otherwise and come to your own conclusion before commenting with tin foil hat comments. There is no conspiracy. Just events that are becoming more apparant.

Rant end. 

Who would benefit from this government system? And is the NWO as simple as you make it to be?

That's what matters.

I never said it would be simple. I'm saying time is running out and the EU works regardless of the old pensioners in the UK signing there own doom. 

Even with a one government system there will be wars as you will have one set of countries being bled dry and the gdp going to wealthy countries. The distribution of wealth, health and resources will be heavily stacked against the likes of Africa, parts of Europe, parts South America and America.

The best example I can think of is the original Pakistan. They took the wealth from the Bangladesh part of Pakistan but redistributed 70% to what is now known as Pakistan. The biased treatment led to activism, student uprising and eventually war.now we have 2 countries instead of the one.

Oh please no. We see in too many countries that their governments are hardly doing their job on a satisfactory level, the idea that we will have some guy in, let's say Brussels make decisions for people in Tokyo is a nightmare. One world government is not going to end war cause the differences will still exist, just look at the US where racial-tensions are higher than in years

A one-world government is a logical end point for democratic nations; dictatorships and monarchies would likely have to join the modern world for a OWG to function. I could see it working for managing trade, disaster relief and mediation of disputes between nations, but standardized legal and political systems among nations will likely never occur apart from participating in the selection of representatives in the OWG.

Optimistically, it would probably function as the US aspires to be; States (in this case, entire nations) functioning autonomously (sovereign) wherever possible, but with the OWG capable of setting the terms in certain areas. This would probably be the most attractive model; it has the appeal of both participating in global cooperation (ensuring maximum influence) while retaining a national political identity.

The ONLY future solution is one where computers rule our daily lives and laws. They are impartial and not swayed by emotion or status. A system that is 100% transparent and incorruptible. That is the only way humanity will ever progress!!

I agree but we might as well be millenia away from creating such a system that has no backdoors, no faults, no chance of subjectivity. As I said, after Stuxnet, that future may as well be dead. There is no possibilty of an uncorruptable system and no solution for a uncrossable air gap.

So many governments, where laws are all legal in different places shows that law is subjective and isn't obsolete and quite stupid.

If the law of the land was literally the full earth I think it'd be easier to justify them and get people to follow.

Do you want an Empire or a Republic?