If that's the sum of your response then I'll assume I was valid in my initial post.

I don't even own a PSP man so I had no reason to respond to anything else. 

As if owning or not owning a console is the measure of what truth you're capable of speaking *rolls eyes*, "I don't own this console so when I say good things about it that means its true" lol. I see... so theres really no need to continue this then if its only your anger at being called a name.

How can Final Fantasy one, to the second last one, be final, if there there is another one after it?

In that case, as a PC gamer, I will be laughing my ass off at everything your puny PS3 can produce in about a year. Quad core gaming is the future, not the Cell. Sorry! 

Nah... that ain't it either...

This is pure conjecture at this point, but there are rumors of not two, not four, but 100-core CPUs on the horizon.

The reason is, at least for me, beatifully elegant: You have 100 cores that are nowhere near as powerful as the ones found on Core2Duos, but a) there's a hundred of them, and b) you have very good power consumption figures since only the cores you need are activated. As an example, for games you'd probably be using all the cores, but if you are just typing your forum posts via browser, that would utilize 1-2 cores (1-2%, as opposed to current Core2Duos that may be utilizing only 1/2 the number of cores, but it's also consuming 48% more energy than it really needs to).

Awesome power, while utilizing only the power you really need. Now that would really be the best of both worlds!

Quoted For Truth.

Yeah, its easy for Sony fans to hold games to a higher standard now but it was only last generation that the PS2 was second to last in graphics above the Dreamcast (and actually beneath it in texturing capability). Funny how in such a short time these same fans developed a sense of entitlement to superior graphics coincidentally when their prefered consoled conveniently turned out to be the most powerful. Wasn't it about this time two to three years ago all we heard was these same people defending the PS2's graphics with, "it has the games" but now that the tables have turned they're all too eager to hold Nintendo accountable for its graphics despite superior sales. Well Sony fans, we'll gladly take those PS2 sales figures off your hands and let you have your graphics, it's looking to be they're all you're going to get this gen.

Can someon post the pics I can't go to that site on my job computer!

to be honest, I think there are much better looking DS games Although that's probably just because of the grainy blown up pictures