zelda>horizon>rest.

but sony was the best in general.

Why not? I'm a quality > quantity kind of guy. Sony had a lot of games but none of them where interesting. As I said above, horizon looks good but Zelda just blows it away.

For me it is a toss up. However I will say that given the popularity of games like Witcher and Skyrim, people will buy a WiiU or more likely an NX for this Zelda game. It takes everything to a whole new level.

I truly believe Nintendo had a chance to capitalize by building off of this and make the NX a success. Not saying it will outsell the PS4, but it will be a success if they build off of the opportunity this game will create.

And I completely agree with you.Quality is more important than quantity.And Sony had alot of quality games.GOW 4, Horizon, Days Gone, RE 7(this one is looking especially great), and many more.

For all the love I have for Nintendo, they only had one title (with new information) that interests me, and it was Zelda.And while Zelda may be the better game of them all, it alone is not enough to win.

Troll attempts are so bad these days.

nah, one great game doesn't make a good e3

sony>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ms>>nintendo

almost 2017, Last Guardian has a release date and people still falling in Anfebious' threads.


Congratulations

comlete fanboy reaction, the nintendo show was allright, zelda looked good, pokemon is amazing, but it was nowhere near better then sony or microsoft, it was better then the EA showing, ill give them that

Ha ha, cute.

Now when the NX comes out and is super successful, they can just buy Sony and Microsoft and make one unified platform!

The Nintendo XPlayCube!

But Horizon Zero Dawn has a release date while Zelda hasn't even though this Nintendo game was introduced 3 years ago....

Nintendo has not been winning anything for the past 4 years, it's time to realise it.