By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Star Fox Zero might be the end of the Star Fox series

spemanig said:
160rmf said:

It sucks for people that developed an aversion for motion controls because of the stupid idea that resembles "casual gaming". So they don't try it.

Oh! And the game doesn't look like Ratchet & Clank, so it sucks

Who ever said anything about casuals? The controls being bad has nothing to do with casuals.

The controls aren't bad, people are bad in this game, they just don't want to assume this.

I am bad at FPS, but i don't blame the controls bc of it. I could get better if i practice it. See, it's not that difficult...



 

 

We reap what we sow

Around the Network
Luke888 said:
PxlStorm said:
Nintendo doesn't think of the terrible sales as crticism, they think of it that nobody wants Star Fox. Same thing will happen for Paper Mario. Two of my favorite Franchise just die off like that...

*cough cough Federation Force*

Right, completely forgot about that. Makes you wonder how unaware Nintendo is of their fans' opinion.



Is unfortunate, but I don't think the series will end.. just be put on hiatus for a long time (like Metroid)



NintenDomination [May 2015 - July 2017]
 

  - Official  VGChartz Tutorial Thread - 

NintenDomination [2015/05/19 - 2017/07/02]
 

          

 

 

Here lies the hidden threads. 

 | |

Nintendo Metascore | Official NintenDomination | VGC Tutorial Thread

| Best and Worst of Miiverse | Manga Discussion Thead |
[3DS] Winter Playtimes [Wii U]

This makes me sad. The anime and the puppets showed so much potential in the IP even if the game itself didn't.



I predict NX launches in 2017 - not 2016

Why do I suddenly want a starfox racing game.



Around the Network
160rmf said:

The controls aren't bad, people are bad in this game, they just don't want to assume this.

I am bad at FPS, but i don't blame the controls bc of it. I could get better if i practice it. See, it's not that difficult...

I'm great at SF0. The controls are dog shit. Being good at something doesn't make that something good. 



I have the game and I think it's very fun!

It took me about 10 minutes to get used to the controls.

Too bad it didn't sell well.



spemanig said:
160rmf said:

The controls aren't bad, people are bad in this game, they just don't want to assume this.

I am bad at FPS, but i don't blame the controls bc of it. I could get better if i practice it. See, it's not that difficult...

I'm great at SF0. The controls are dog shit. Being good at something doesn't make that something good. 

You are great with the controls that you find shitty... Where's the logic?

Care to elaborate why do you think it's shit and how it could be "playable". because for me the controls are very intuitive and suitable for a game like star fox.

I can assume that you hate the controls just for the sake of it, because that is what it looks like



 

 

We reap what we sow

pokoko said:
daredevil.shark said:

Good. Bad games don't deserve sequel. Plus I like this type of bad news.

User moderated -RavenXtra

Hold on.  WHY is someone getting banned for saying bad games don't deserve sequels?  I've seen that said MANY times on these forums about other games.

According to the ban itself:

"Trolling (You were specifically told by Carl not too long ago to stay out of Star Fox Zero threads if you couldn't behave, and here you are again: stoking the flames and gloating about any bad news regarding the game. It's becoming very transparent at this point, and if you can't take the advice of mods and learn to dole out criticism of this game in a civil manner, then bans will just get longer.) ~ RavenXtra"

 

Apparently shark's history was taken into consideration.



I haven't played it but it looked really low budget from what i saw. 130 people for 2 years? Thats crazy, isn't that the size of the team that worked on Uncharted 4?