Didnt you just look at a few stuff in a minute trailer then assume everything else is exactly like Sticker Star

The core concept and mechanics of the game is a bit more than "a few stuff" and regardless is better than literally no evidence, and both sides of the argument are of course assuming things, but one side's assumptions are far more reasonable.

Gamers are notirious for overhyping things and then being mad when thier stupid expectations arent met.

I mean, just look at E3 hype every year. I cant have any hype for this year after last year was complete trash outside the Xbox presentation.

Then you're in denial. Here's some of the "nothing" that tells us exactly what this game is.

Literally the entirety of the trailer screamed Sticker Star. The characters, or rather the lack of, instead nothing but generic toads, the same as in SS. The battle system, a stripped and watered-down version of the classics with no experience, FP, BP, partners, or special moves, the same as SS. It uses a resource mechanic, the same as SS, just replace stickers with cards, which can be found in the field, only making battles pointless and better off avoided. Even those god damn Thing stickers are back. How you progress through the game is segmented into stages/levels that you beat by reaching a goal at the end and that's it. Further still, instead of an interconnected world with areas logically joined together they just have a world map. Yep, all that was also in Sticker Star. Even small nuances like the frame by frame animation, not even a hiyah or woohoo out of Mario, and the attack names, types, and their icons are ripped straight out of Sticker Star.

So if you still think Color Splash is anything but Sticker Star 2 and thus trash then I'm not wasting anymore time with one who can't see what's right in front of them.

Don't blame gamers. This time the only ones to blame are Nintendo.

Its depends, I guess, on who you're talking to. I'm probably gonna say the obvious, but nothing from the trailer said it's gonna be bad or good. Personally I've not played any of the PM games so I don't know much, just that I like to play before judging. All I know is that a minute doesn't do good enough for some to be convinced it's good or not. Plus, whether you believe it or like it or not, not everyone hates SS. Again, I don't know how the 2+ million consumers who bought the game thought of it so who the hell knows. It probably wasn't that much front loaded and it did well overtime with decent legs so there was constant interest after launch. Maybe I don't know anything about it but that's my two cents from what I know.

I understand your disappointment, (the only Ninty franchise  would say has honestly gotten screwed to the point of being "bad" is Paper Mario) but dont pretend your overblown pessimism is much better than his overblown optimism.

Then you're in denial. Here's some of the "nothing" that tells us exactly what this game is.

Literally the entirety of the trailer screamed Sticker Star. The characters, or rather the lack of, instead nothing but generic toads, the same as in SS. The battle system, a stripped and watered-down version of the classics with no experience, FP, BP, partners, or special moves, the same as SS. It uses a resource mechanic, the same as SS, just replace stickers with cards, which can be found in the field, only making battles pointless and better off avoided. Even those god damn Thing stickers are back. How you progress through the game is segmented into stages/levels that you beat by reaching a goal at the end and that's it. Further still, instead of an interconnected world with areas logically joined together they just have a world map. Yep, all that was also in Sticker Star. Even small nuances like the frame by frame animation, not even a hiyah or woohoo out of Mario, and the attack names, types, and their icons are ripped straight out of Sticker Star.

So if you still think Color Splash is anything but Sticker Star 2 and thus trash then I'm not wasting anymore time with one who can't see what's right in front of them.