and what perfect 10 reviews are clickbait and wrong? how did you like uncharted 4 would it get a good score from you?

I'd like to point out to detractors that the real problem here is that a score was not given in this review, and that the Post actually released another review later with an actual score attached.

Skimming the review, I can also say that this writer doesn't really know what makes a game good, or at very least doesn't understand how to review games objectively for the purpose of recommending them. This review is no better than User Score garbage reviews. He barely discusses gameplay, and instead rants about how much he dislikes the story and the detail. He's completely missed the point of gaming, and his review should come down for the simple fact that it's not a game review: It's a movie review. 

YEAH! Stifle that freedom of speech! No one needed that anyways!

This has to be one of the most ridiculous petitions I've seen in a while. Do you honestly have nothing better to do with your life, rather than to obsess over the percentile of an incredibly high meta score?

Easy question: Did you like the game? If the question to that answer is yes, you shouldn't even give a shit about any rewiews at all, let alone meta scores. If you need validation of your own opinion that desperately you should work on your self esteem, not create pointless petitions.

Rewiews are for people who don't know if they will like a piece of media and are trying to make a buying decision off of them. They are not some kind of circle wank for people validating their choice in console, exclusives and general taste in games.

Lastly if you want to strike the lowerst scores from a meta, you have to strike the highest too, otherwise you don't arrive at a fair estimate.

4 out of 10 is ridiculous, no matter how you slice it. Dick move.

I don't think the problem is the game getting a bad review. Everyone has different tastes and standards, and the fact that, out of 91 reviews at the time of this comment only ONE is negative (all of the rest are way above 75) is a testament to the quality of the game.

The petition shouls be about changing the rules and regulations of Metacritic. If I'm not mistaken, the reviewers with the most likes have more weight when scoring a game, and that might send the wrong message, and it's not fair for the newer review sites. But by focusing this on the Washington Post review, this petition is making an ass of itself, because it looks like it can't take bad criticism even when the game is overwhelmingly loved.

I was going to buy this game but now that its MC score has fallen from 94 to 93 I've decided it must not be worth it. Yeah, right!

Troy baker tweeted it so I am sure it will get the amount of signatures, it is a really unobjective score obviously, even if you would personally not like this game any good reviewer can see its not a 4, its above average even if you hated the story or disliked the gameplay or whatever, there is so much done well and some things exceptional.

I signed it because a 4 is just..... if it was a 6.5 or something I would have said "everyone is entitled to their opinion" even tough I liked this game a lot.

Done ! Also published the Petition on Facebook; all Naughty Dog and Uncharted fans should do the same ;)

Negative!

That was not an opinion, that was not a Review;  it was a Joke or utter gargabe, one of the two; so it must me removed.  Quality control ;) 

Isn't it also freedom of speech that every person (in this case every gamer) has the right to express their opinion against this review if they don't like it?

and as far as I know this petition isn't created to ban all low scores uncharted 4 will get, but was created to "... Also , he never gave the game a rating in his review , so the 40/100 should either be removed from the metascore or added to his review. Things must be cleared"

Fun fact: signing this petition takes less time than writing your comment so I guess you also have to much freetime^^ wanna do something together?