Nem said:
Exagerate much? How do you go from Austria to the whole of europe?
Also, before blaming europe perhaps blame the ones that brought wars to the middle-east? How many refugee's is the US taking in? How many is Canada taking in?
This is not ok, but it is a difficult problem to solve.
|
This.
OP:
You're right. Integration has failed many places in Europe. The huge amount of refugees make it impossible to offer an effective integration. That's not fair neither to the refugees nor to the European population but it's because we feel obligated to help refugees from a country we're bombing.
I live in Denmark. A country with a size of less than 43,000 km2. We receive 4 times as many refugees per capita than the US. It's not possible to avoid creating parallel societies in such a tiny country. The US is not completely innocent, you know. Bombing the hell out of Middle East knowing that most refugees will end up in Europe.
A solution could be to send a large number of international ground forces to e.g. Syria to be able to help the refugees in the local areas. In that way fewer innocent people would get killed and the population wouldn't have to become refugees and leave their country in the first place. After the threat e.g. ISIS has been neutralized Europe, US, etc. would help funding a rebuild of the areas.
That'll take a lot of money but ironically not much compared to what most European countries spend on ineffective integration (600,000 US$ in average per refugee in Sweden and Denmark).