I think a lot of people misread what I said. Zelda U doesn't count as it's not exclusive. It is still being cannibalised by the NX's release date. I certainly don't see it coming out before the NX's release and it certainly looks like Nintendo is going to push it for people to upgrade for a better experience.

As for some of those other games. Yes they are coming, but you guys mentioned what? 3? While some of them look cool. They don't have something for everyone. Which is why I feel it's a notable issue. People complained about Nintendo have droughts before, but this is something different.

I watched the video and I am mega confused about something. Why does the 3DS version look out of contrast and so bright? I can tell you that my copy of the game doesn't look like that, and I doubt my 3DS is a special snowflake. This a very bad comparison because the recording quality is crap. It doesn't even look remotely right. Then again.... even screen shot of a 3DS game looks like shit in comparison of how it looks on screen :/ 3DS games need to be bullshot for that reason.

I've played and beaten the PS2 and 3DS version and I got my friend to play the HD version on the PS3. I watched him play it all the way through. The resolution is worse on the 3DS and there are indeed a fair few jaggies, but the details and poly count was higher. You can see the details on his beard and hair, which was more or less missing on the HD version. There's some environmental details removed but the textures on character models were higher. The frame rate was an issue on the 3DS.

Something I do want to add... the Vita version looks amazing! I'm impressed, but I shouldn't be, the DPI would be very good. I love how they brought the color out more.  The HD collection is just a resolution increase from the original PS2 games, where Snake Eater 3D had new models made for the game, with higher poly count. Also the game play was better on the 3DS, improved controls and you could do a few more things that really helped the experience imho.

Thanks! ill give it a try- that will be great- 

I'm glad that you had fun with the 3DS version. But a few changes of Snake's hair and some minor added effects doesn't make it to the "vastly superior version", when in all other departments there had to be made compromises/sacrifices, especially resolution (combined with no anti-aliasing, resulting in jaggies) and frame rate, but also many textures and less foliage.

• http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-03-06-metal-gear-solid-snake-eater-3d-review
• http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-tech-analysis-metal-gear-remastered

Have you actually played it? You're posting some very stretched out shots. I've played all the versions, and I got to say the 3DS one is the best. Especially with the greater control of freedom and ability to do more things like extract information and hold enemies as hostages.

1. Yeah, I have played through the 3DS-Demo several times, I played through the Vta version and I've played the PS2 version several times. Haven't played the PS3 or 3DS version, still hoping for a PC version of the MGS Collection.

2. The screenshots and screengrabs from the PS2/3DS-comparison video are from Digital Foundry, normally they know their stuff.

But here are some from Gamespot... don't really look better:

I'm sure you'll dismiss them either, ignorance is bliss. But you are free to post some of your own 3DS screenshots, if they represent the version so much better.

3. The 3DS version had some improvements, but most reviewers wrote that these advantages can't outweigh the disadvantages.

EuroGamer / Digital foundry: "Ultimately, this is a lacklustre port of a fantastic game. The sad thing is that the improvements to manoeuvrability and updated visuals show us what the ultimate Metal Gear Solid 3 would look like - but then Snake Eater 3D fails to deliver that due to stodgy aiming, low resolutions and a choppy frame-rate. Even in this diminished form, Snake Eater is still massively enjoyable, but unless you're really keen on playing it on the go, it's hard to recommend this over its console counterparts."

Game Informer: "This version is only worthwhile for people who have no other choice. Even then, with the $40 you'd spend on Snake Eater 3D, you could probably buy an old PS2 and the original game, or the HD Collection on 360 and PS3. If you want the real Snake Eater experience, those are far better options."

GameTrailers: "Aside from the original PS2 release, this is easily the worst iteration of Snake Eater. The lack of extras, the frustrating controls, and the overall performance issues hold it back from being one of the premier third-party games for the 3DS. Don't be hypnotized by this snake's gaze--this is far from the optimal way to experience this classic."

Destructoid: "It all results in a game with 9.5/10 ideas delivered in a 6/10 package. If you already own the original, or if you aren't keen on playing Snake Eater on a portable, then there is no reason to pick it up again. If you do want the game on the go, you may be better off waiting for the Metal Gear Solid HD Collection on the PS Vita. If you're never going to buy a Vita and you have no other way to get your hands on Metal Gear Solid 3, you should definitely grab Snake Eater 3D. Those who were hoping for a new or improved version of the game will be disappointed."

I hope so , kimishima seems like no president before, but he does bad decisions, like having NIntendo not having the NX reveal at E3, and so many droughts. I wonder if hes taking any risks, or if he has another bigger plan up in his sleeve

Probably only about a year, which is a shame because Mario Kart 8's online is really fun. At least Nintendo has local multiplayer games that are future-proofed so they can still have a variety of multiplayer options once online is shut down.