Yeah yeah it makes sense to support a socialist. 

You're totally right.  Having 2200 classified emails, some of which were either top secret or classified at the time they were sent or recieved is not a problem.  It's also not a problem that you now have a hacker, who is currently being held by the FBI, claiming that he got into the Clinton server.  Let's have this person have the most powerful position in the world run our country.  Or the fact that she has taken millions of dollars from countries in the middle east with her Clinton Foundation.  She is so corrupt it is unbelievable.  By the way, the FBI aren't interrogating her, they are simply playing patty cake in a back room.

The system is rigged and it goes to show that you have not being paying attention to this election.  Berine Sanders tied in Iowa (1st state) and crushed her in New Hampshire (2nd state).  That means she was losing in both pledged delegates and popular vote.  But the system is so rigged that she was winning in delegates by 350 just after two states (Hillary - 394   Bernie - 44).  This rigging process comes from superdelegates, which I have already previously explained in a prior post.  The next state Nevada she finally won and was ahead like 502 delegates to 77 delegates.  So she gained 108 delegates in Nevada that only has 35 total delegates to give out.  If you were ahead 394 to 44 or 502 to 77, wouldn't that give you enough momentum going forward to eventually win?  But keep thinking the system isn't rigged.  If the shoe was on the other foot, you would say it is rigged.

Again you have no clue what you are talking about.  How was it possible for Bill Clinton to have oral sex with an intern?  Why wasn't there anybody else around to see this?  Perhaps everyone in the government went home because there was a government shutdown (everyone goes home except for interns!!!).  Oh that's right.  It was Newt Gingrich and company that balanced the budget.  

Now I don't agree with Sanders on a lot of issues but he is at least exposing the corrupt system on the democratic side so I applaud him for that.  Clinton's positions are absoultely all over the place.  She has most recently said that she wants to put coal miners out of jobs.  Lol

Not exactly.

Most polls have him getting beaten by Clinton and even worse by Sanders in the general election. And Clinton has more primary votes than anyone (Trump included).

He's done well at beating a group of largely dull Republicans, but the general election is a very different ball game and that's why Republicans tried very hard to deny him the nomination, because most polling data shows he would lose and lose badly in a general election.

Polls? The entire political spectrum of the country as well as the almost all media said his campaign wouldnt last for 2 months, when he entered the race in june last year. As for polls, every politician he ever went up against tanked in polls after Trump attacked them, starting from Rand to Bush, Rubio and eventually even Cruz and Kasich. There was a recent poll which showed Trump above Hillary and he barely started on her, and he has way more ammunation on her than he had on any other presidental candidate.

As for votes, Hilary has the voters split between 2 people, her and Bernie. Trump has over 8  other candidates splitting the vote and he's still quite close to Clinton. But if overall quantity of votes is what you care, the ''dull''  Republicans have over 3 million more votes than democrats in this election

That's not neccessarily a positive e for Trump though because what that shows is while he is successful at attracting a certain group of people, that also comes with a lot of people who are coming out to vote *against* him. High voter turn out is good for Democrats, always has been.

Well, then one would excpect that he'd lose the primary. Instead he is about to have the most votes any republican canditate has ever had in history. Which tells me he brings more people to vote for him than against him. Also, a record number of democrats have voted for him as well

He can try to attack Hilary in the same way by huffing and puffing and calling names and all that but I don't think it will be as successful of a tactic against Clinton and it could back fire, he tried the same thing with Carly Fiorina by implying she was too ugly to be president and I think that was one of the rare times he back pedalled sensing that women were really pissed off by that.

Carly dropped out twice tho, didnt she? Also, I doubt he'll attack Hilary on her looks, there are way, waay more jucy issues he can attack her with. 

The polls aren't always accurate, but RCP (real clear politics) is a fairly decent indicator, for example Obama only had double digit leads over Romney like twice the entire cycle. Clinton already has hit 13+ up on Trump three times.

Again, many polls predicted he wont even last past the first debate, many predicted Bush will be GOP frontrunner, look how that turned out. Also, a recent Rassmussen report showed him above Clinton , and he barely started on her. I know that many polls still favour Clinton, but there is a lot of time from here till november.

This is why IMO the Republican establishment does not want him as the candidate because they fear he'll getted routed in the general election, and demographics are not neccessarily great for him, he'll probably lose big among women (who were 54% of the vote bloc last cycle) and blacks and latinos (who are about 1/3 of the population now).

Do you know what demographic Clinton is doing terribly with? White men. Also guess which demographic is usually the biggest one? AS for Blacks and Lations, they voted last time and in 2008 based on identity politics, meaning for a minorty race (Obama), when there is a choice between 2 whites again, I doubt they'll be as active as before