Of course it matters who wins.

Look at Obama the biggest joke your country has ever had for a President ever, do you think Putin would have pushed his luck like he has with the likes of Regan, kennedy even Bush? No chance.

Like here now our spineles Prime minister David Cameron has done yet another one of his famous U turns and is going to allow Syrian children in to the UK from Europe, not just that but give each a place in a school worth 1.3 million each a year. If we had Farage that would not happen.

So yes it matter, it matter a lot.

Neither give me a third option

No, I completely and whole heartedly believe that. It's all a joke to me. And no serious discussion about politics will ever be made with me. So continuing even this conversation is pretty much a dead end. Continue to reply if you like though

Who knows? I don't really care. I don't pay attention to what Obama does and have no interest in what he, and much less his successor, does or did. As for foriegn politics, my opinion isn't much different. No matter who wins they won't be able to make the promises they keep. Trump wont be able to make a wall nor will Hillary do what... whatever Hillary plans. Honestly I have no idea what Hillary has told the public, they never mention her  

That's what I meant by it not mattering. The exaggerated things they promise will almost certainly not go into fruition. However, with Trump being an outsider to typical politics what he does or says could be entertaining as president.

I'd prefer Bernie Sanders to either...by a country mile. I'll take Hillary over Trump, mostly because I think a Trump win will validate America's bigotry, racism and general distrust of science and learning. I see a lot of representation of these last four qualities here on VGC a lot...and it makes me sad. Mostly because I don't think you mean it...but that you just like to piss people off. I guess it lets you feel like you have some effect on this world.

oh ok.

Interesting idea, though I don't know if that would be enough to keep candidates in who did poorly in some states that would do well in others, since it takes a lot of money to run and those that do porly early have a harder time getting donors to keep giving.

One idea that I've hears is to make it more regional, so candidates can focus on one part of the country at a time, another thing I've heard is to make the process shorter so there aren't months between the first and last states voting.

You're very angry. I think you need to stop reading UKIP propaganda. It's mostly bullshit scapegoating of the EU for our own politicians incompetence.

Holy crap, there is intelligent life on this board. Big government is not the answer and taxing people to death isn't as well. I find it very fusterating that there is a lot of Californians moving from their shit state with high taxes to Texas and still vote the liberals in. They are the reasons why you had to move in the first place. 

where's the i am an american but i aint voting for either option?

I probably won't vote at all this year, but if I did I would definitely vote Clinton. I am firmly in the #nevertrump camp. I have never been so appalled by a politician and I actually find it kind of embarrassing that he is a nominee for president...