Trump

Americans, please realize voting 3rd party is an option

i am not american
for the good of the word : both are bad
for fun : trump

I probably won't vote in general election. Don't like either and don't like the electoral college.  Rather see just popular vote for Presidential election.  They say your vote counts but if your state votes for other party then your vote doesn't count.  A vote for anyone not Republican in Texas for the Presidential election is like not voting at all.

I've heard Trump say many things, but religious or anti-science, not so much. Now Cruz, yes, that would be true of that guy, but I can't attribute that to Trump.  

Bernie or bust! These candidates are a joke. Bernie is a good guy that actually cares for others. What many don't understand is he does not want to give handouts, he wants to reallocate taxes to roadways, education, and healthcare (Really should be basic human rights anyhow) rather than towards wars and military spending. Having a defensive military and cutting that spending by the amount that Bernie wants to would STILL leave America with the largest military in the world. I personally would prefer our taxes go towards bettering our people and keeping them alive, not only that, Bernie helped Vermont immensely while he was there, and could definitely help this country move in the right direction.

Hillary is a flat out liar, being investigated by our own FBI because she doesn't understand what the word "confidential" means. And Trump is a celebrity who knows nothing about government or how to keep peace, we will be blown to smithereens in probably about 6 months if he becomes president.

Bernie Sanders.

The voting system in USA is so complicated and strange. It is as if it was from the 18th century.

Why does it matter if he is Canadian?  

They counted them along with the other delegates because you had Hillary Clinton (Elite) going against Barack Obama (Elite).  Both had a reasonable amount of superdelagates unlike what is currently being seen where Bernie Sanders only has 7%.  Hillary Clinton was leading in superdelegates up until May 11, 2008.  In 2008, they sat down and thought who would be the better candidate, the first black president or the first woman president?  Seeing as how Barack Obama was holding bigger rallies and had all of the energy, they went with him and switched over these unbound superdelegates to him causing him to clinch and become the demoractic nominee on June 3rd 2008.

The reason why they are holding off in mentioning the superdelegates this time because, as I stated before, Bernie only has 7% of the superdelegates. What would be the point for some delegate analyst to go up and discuss the rigged delegate count?  Let's look at Bernie Sanders chances of winning the election down 350 delegates just after two states!!  Or even better, the next state was Nevada where Hillary won by like 5% of the vote over Bernie but then gained like 108 delegates that day (mainly due to MORE superdelegates).  After three states it was something like 508 delegates to Bernie Sanders 77 delegates.  Imagine an analyst going up to the board and discussing Bernie Sanders chances of winning and becoming the Democratic Nominee where he is down 431 delegates just after 3 states!  That would be completely laughable.  So it is no surprise to me and many others to see these analysts instantly say "well let's just forget about the superdelegates at this point".  Holding off in mentioning these superdelegates doesn't eliminate the fact that you have a rigged "democratic" nominating process.

You had some states that were proportional, winner take all, and hybrid states.  The hybrid states turned into winner take all if one candidate won the majority of the vote.  Each state decided on their own rules, which is why you see such diversity.  Of course you do have some instances where the elites wanted to shift the delegates in favor of the elite candidates.  Take for instance Florida's winner take all state in an election that had Jeb Bush, governor of Florida, and Marco Rubio, senator of Florida.  Those 99 delegates were supposed to go to one of those candidates, but ended up backfiring and going to Doanld Trump.  I am not saying that the republican side is perfect, but at least the voters could elect an outsider, unlike what is perceived to be impossible on the democratic side.

**Edit**  If the Democrats had some winner take all states, at least they would know ahead of time what was at stake and could therefore campaign harder in those given states.  But people like Bernie Sanders have absolutely ZERO control over these superdelegates.  

Yes please