http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-hands-on-with-mirrors-edge-catalyst

"Overall, there's a sense that DICE has really pushed the boat out with Mirror's Edge Catalyst, but perhaps the level of ambition from the developer outstrips the console's capabilities - already pushed to the limit, as evidenced by the sub-native rendering resolutions."

I just hope it's good, screw the resolution.

Shocked. Buying the inferior version still.

PS4 neo is our only hope xD

As long as they can fix this before launch.

Unfortunately, performance isn't as solid as we'd like, and frame-rates frequently fluctuate on a regular basis across both consoles. At worst, a lunge down to near 30fps rears its head in one particular scene, but metrics mostly stick between 50-60fps over a run of play. This causes judder that distracts during high speed traversal, with momentary spikes on controller latency having an impact on pulling off more complex moves.

Oh well, there's always Steam.

Could be wrong, but nowhere have I seen a vid that looks like it's pushing visuals to where it should be lowered this much.

Gotta love all these posts completely ignoring the idea of whether or not the game is actually good or not and only using what resolution it runs in as their criteria for buying it.

I fear for the entire gaming industry over the next few years, with "gamers" like these.

Yup... in the future everyone will say this is only happening cause devs decided to optimize for Neo and fucked over the early adopters....

OP... isn't this game running at 60fps? 

I think this is because the game runs at 60fps..... or at least tries to. 

SW bf runs at 900p 60fps..... If devs don't aim for 60fps, i suspect visuals woulf improve dramatically for games....