gooch_destroyer said:
HintHRO said: Not really surprising with the 30 dollar price tag |
Even if it was $60 it would still do very well.
|
I think it would've reviewed significantly more poorly if it was $60. The game's length is perfect for its price, but if they'd done a full price release (on top of the film, which is sort of plot-important in the minutiae) then it would've hampered at least some sales.
AlfredoTurkey said:
GribbleGrunger said:
And what exactly would this PR be for? Flagging sales? To cover up bad reviews? What?
|
It's the equivalent to Sony saying "Thanks to our wonderful and loyal fans around the world, we're happy to announce that once again, PS4 is the best selling console this holiday season." Or Microsoft saying "Thanks to the enthusiam of gamers worldwide, Halo earned more money in it's opening weekend than Star Wars and broke the record for the most revenue at launch."
It's what these companies have been doing for decades now. It's nothing new.
|
With a series that hit its relative rock bottom four years ago, where everybody was asking what happened to Ratchet, the fact that a remake movie tie-in game is the fastest selling in the series says loads more than the usual PR. It means we're at the beginning of a series Renaissance. You're heavily undercutting what this game is doing by calling it a simple PR move (especially when, as others have said, it's got an insane extended opening window compared to other games this month that debuted big and fell fast!).
You should check out my YouTube channel, The Golden Bolt! I review all types of video games, both classic and modern, and I also give short flyover reviews of the free games each month on PlayStation Plus to tell you if they're worth downloading. After all, the games may be free, but your time is valuable!