But not significantly so. Irrelevant point anyway, since game quality/minority forum go-ers opinions do not directly correlate with sales for either the software or the hardware. Great/forum loved games can sell like crap while crap/forum hated games can sell amazingly.
"Sales of some game dont equal impact they have on system. " Stop saying this nonsense if you can't provide proof. I've already explained how sales are the only way to tell. Also you're insane if you're trying to tell me Galaxy did more for the Wii than NSMBWii, and if you are atleast provide proof since the sales clearly say otherwise. Actually don't, those games aren't relevant for determing these franchises relevance nowadays. Just explain to me how cold hard sales data doesn't matter at all/less than minority opinions that have no direct correlation to sales.
Actually 93 metascore is singnafitly better than 84. And it not only about forums, 3D Mario game brings way more attention to platform than any 2D platformer, but you can keep deny that. It not about fourms only, reality is that 3D Mario World is great game and one of best games on Wii U.
'Super Mario 3D World' is the best reason to own a Wii U
You will have hard time finding similar article for NSMBU.
When you can prove that I am wrong you can say I am saying nonsense. Can you prove that I am wrong when I say "Sales of some game dont equal impact they have on system"!? No, sales of games does not equals impact they have on sales of that system, you didn't provide anything to disprove that. Again, you did not prove anything with sales numbers of games, espacial with heavy bundled games. Nintendo Land sold more than Splatoon, 3D Mario World, Mario Maker and Smash Bros 4, buy your pont Nintendo Land had much better impact on console than any of those games beacuse it sold more copies.