Darwinianevolution said:
No :( |
Oh, bummer... :(
Dance my pretties!
The Official Art Thread - The Official Manga Thread - The Official Starbound Thread
Darwinianevolution said:
No :( |
Oh, bummer... :(
Dance my pretties!
The Official Art Thread - The Official Manga Thread - The Official Starbound Thread
Cloudman said:
I don't really see that happening. It was just an idea they had and they finally got to do it. I feel the next one is likely not going to be like Fates. |
Why wouldn't they? People obviously don't care about having to get two versions of the game. If they're able to get more money out of people, why not. Pokemon will have two versions forever because people will still buy one or both.
Awesome! From what i've heard of it it seems to have deserved it too
NNID: b00moscone
Switch ID: SW-5475-6755-1986
3DS friend-Code: 4613-6380-5406
PSN: b00mosconi
RolStoppable said:
I was able to place a preorder on amazon.de last week, now it's once again not possible to order it. Estimated delivery date for my order is one month after release, so yeah... Anyway, I just wanted to say that it won't hurt to check online retailers every now and then. Maybe you'll have some luck eventually. |
Spanish online stores went out of stock months ago, and they haven't got any extra. Not even Amazon.
Australia EBGames had a second shipment for it. And that already sold out, and will release around June.
Pocky Lover Boy!
I thought that it was 3 separate games? Why are we counting them together?
VGPolyglot said: I thought that it was 3 separate games? Why are we counting them together? |
2 seperate games (unless proven otherwise)
tbone51 said:
Third version isnt included for Sales. That said, the approach they did with FE Fates is actually really well played out. Only Con about it which people come up with is the game is split which honestly you get for $60. If your gonna complain about price FE is a well made up game that is worth that price imo anyway especially when its literally 2 games.
|
It's not 2 games. It's One game sold 2 (or 3) times.
Hoshido/nohr only got half the units/characters/weapons/skills, it's not a full game. And the story of both of these really suck hard, probably the worst story/MC/Bad guy since ever.
The dlc has all characters (and subquests), the "canon" story, all class/item/etc AND the good maps from nohr (+ others) Only the dlc is a complete game .
(ironic isn't it ? And ofc you can't buy it alone, you need to get a "who care" path).
Actually, it would have been better it they would only release this dlc as the new "fire emblem", instead of 2 poor games.
outlawauron said:
Why wouldn't they? People obviously don't care about having to get two versions of the game. If they're able to get more money out of people, why not. Pokemon will have two versions forever because people will still buy one or both. |
Weren't the pokemon games split to encourage player interaction more? Splitting some pokemon between 2 versions helped drive the purpose of trading and interacting with others.... Or you buy both versions and be your own friend, haha... Then you would even need 2 GBs...
Fates however was an idea one of the devs had in mind for the longest time, and this was a good chance to finally do it. The drive was choice and having players do so with two sides of a big picture. This would have a much bigger emphasis on that decision when you had to buy one of the sides. This was pushed further when the director (someone in the team, I forget exactly) wanted a 3rd side cuz he didn't want to choose either side. You could say splitting the games works similarly with trading games with friends to see what the other side looked like.
Seeing how Fates focuses a lot on this idea, I don't really see them doing that again as it wouldn't really hold that same interest Fates did.
Or I could be wrong and they do it again.
Dance my pretties!
The Official Art Thread - The Official Manga Thread - The Official Starbound Thread
Cloudman said: Weren't the pokemon games split to encourage player interaction more? Splitting some pokemon between 2 versions helped drive the purpose of trading and interacting with others.... Or you buy both versions and be your own friend, haha... Then you would even need 2 GBs... Fates however was an idea one of the devs had in mind for the longest time, and this was a good chance to finally do it. The drive was choice and having players do so with two sides of a big picture. This would have a much bigger emphasis on that decision when you had to buy one of the sides. This was pushed further when the director (someone in the team, I forget exactly) wanted a 3rd side cuz he didn't want to choose either side. You could say splitting the games works similarly with trading games with friends to see what the other side looked like. Seeing how Fates focuses a lot on this idea, I don't really see them doing that again as it wouldn't really hold that same interest Fates did. Or I could be wrong and they do it again. |
I can see them employing this approach again only as one full game in future instead of separate ones, it probably won't be to the extent of Fates but I can see the whole choice struture being implemented in future games.