By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Ratchet and Clank Movie Reviews and Boxoffice performance

Wright on 25 April 2016
axumblade said:

We can all rest easy knowing Uwe Boll didnt do anything with it.

 

But aren't you curious about what would have been the result?



Around the Network
d21lewis on 25 April 2016

It certainly doesn't look cheap and it has some big name starts on its roster



Mr_No on 25 April 2016
Wright said:
axumblade said:

We can all rest easy knowing Uwe Boll didnt do anything with it.

 

But aren't you curious about what would have been the result?

Hell no! I rather have a R&C movie by Shyamalan-- No wait, that's as bad.

Now imagine if it was made by Don Bluth.



Wright on 25 April 2016
Mr_No said:

Hell no! I rather have a R&C movie by Shyamalan-- No wait, that's as bad.

Now imagine if it was made by Don Bluth.

 

Dude, I'd fucking love a R&C Shyamalan movie if it was in the vein of The Sixth Sense, Unbreakable or Signs. xD



Boutros on 25 April 2016

I'm expecting it to perform similarly to Astro Boy.

Total Lifetime Grosses
Domestic: $19,551,067 49.0%
+ Foreign: $20,335,919 51.0%
= Worldwide: $39,886,986



Around the Network
Boutros on 25 April 2016
Acevil said:
spurgeonryan said:
Will everyone be happy with 50 million domestic?

That is a bit low I would think. Animation films are huge gamble money wise. 

(Not as much as an Action flick)

Unfortunately there's little to no chance it does 50m domestic. Half that would be good. As far as I know the movie costed below 20m to produce so add in all the other costs and it probably needs 40-50m worldwide to be profitable.



Acevil on 25 April 2016
Boutros said:
Acevil said:

That is a bit low I would think. Animation films are huge gamble money wise. 

(Not as much as an Action flick)

Unfortunately there's little to no chance it does 50m domestic. Half that would be good. As far as I know the movie costed below 20m to produce so add in all the other costs and it probably needs 40-50m worldwide to be profitable.

If that is really the budget, I am impressed 1. Since, and 2. I really have overestimated the attemp they made. 



 

Teeqoz on 25 April 2016
Boutros said:
Acevil said:

That is a bit low I would think. Animation films are huge gamble money wise. 

(Not as much as an Action flick)

Unfortunately there's little to no chance it does 50m domestic. Half that would be good. As far as I know the movie costed below 20m to produce so add in all the other costs and it probably needs 40-50m worldwide to be profitable.

I've seen this number elsewhere on the internet, but do you have a source (for 20 million)? Also, it opened to 560,000 $ in France for those who are interested.



d21lewis on 25 April 2016

In the other thread, I predicted $25m but with Jungle Book and Civil War, I suspect it will do much worse on opening week. Maybe as low as $10m.



Boutros on 25 April 2016
Teeqoz said:
Boutros said:

Unfortunately there's little to no chance it does 50m domestic. Half that would be good. As far as I know the movie costed below 20m to produce so add in all the other costs and it probably needs 40-50m worldwide to be profitable.

I've seen this number elsewhere on the internet, but do you have a source (for 20 million)? Also, it opened to 560,000 $ in France for those who are interested.

Yeah it's actually $15.3 million (not sure whether it's USD or CAD) with $10.1 million net of refundable tax credits. So the movie was really cheap to make for Rainmaker.

Here's the financial report in which it is discussed (page 4):

http://www.rainmaker.com/pdf/Q2%202015%20quarterly%20report.pdf