By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Women are not fit for front line combat!

Tagged games:

 

Why can't women be on the front line?

They're physically not fit. 62 32.29%
 
They can do it if trained properly. 102 53.13%
 
That's not women's duty. 12 6.25%
 
I'm weak so I can't fat... 16 8.33%
 
Total:192
Locknuts on 08 April 2016

Only recruit the best. If you find women who are better than men: recruit them, but certainly don't lower the fitness standards. That's suicide.



Around the Network
Nautilus on 08 April 2016

Well, he does have a point.From a physical perspective, woman will always in general be less capable than men.But with the wars we have now, where we use guns and bombs and chemical agents and whatnot, the difference is really tiny, and that difference can be conpensated with training.So no, I dont agree with him.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

weaveworld on 08 April 2016

No one should be 'fit' for front line combat.



Player2 on 08 April 2016
curl-6 said:
If women can meet the existing standards for fitness and such, let them in.

However, that bar should not be lowered for them. Lives and security are more important than political correctness.

Well, that's pretty much it.



Aidah on 08 April 2016

if they can pass the same tests and training then they are as much man as an actual man. Otherwise F that, no dice!



Around the Network
Lawlight on 08 April 2016
Psychotic said:
Aeolus451 said:

Aren't you pushing that shit a bit far? No reason to be nasty.

Maybe I am, I admit, but there sure is a reason to be nasty. Aren't freedom and equality the two main principles of western civilization? When somebody argues against those, especially citing the same fallacious arguments like people did in the past to justify when we today know as horrific acts of discrimination, I think that's a sufficient reason for a little hostility, no?

No, there is no reason to be hostile.

Anyway, 200 years of technology doesn't erase hundreds of thousands of years of evolution that lead to the division of labour.

In any case, if they can pass the same physical tests then it's fine but, as said in the video, they will have to lower the standards for women to rise up the ranks.



hatmoza on 08 April 2016

Biologically, there is a fucking difference between male and female. It's simple as that. It has nothing to do with equal rights or equality. Are there exceptions? Yes. I've seen women that would kick my ass. The overwhelming majority of women however do not have the same build as men.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

CosmicSex on 08 April 2016
barneystinson69 said:
CosmicSex said:
because being on the front line of a war is really a great place to be. I would rather have sex.

Don't really understand the analogy on this one...

My  point is that the rebuke against gender equality and bigots disguised as anti SJW are boring me.  I beleive that people who devote time into coming up with reasons why woman or gays or anyone else can't do what you can do are just sexually repressed.  So instead of worrying about what other people can and can't do, I am more interested in having sex.   I am gonna go get laid right now. 



Lawlight on 08 April 2016

I think the people who randomly spout that they are going to have sex in an unrelated conversation are usually the ones who are least likely to get some. Just saying.



Rab on 08 April 2016

The Women that are kicking ISIS ass

Women are more than capable

Enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpesgydG5sQ