Yes

Such as announcing another baby

I doubt you checked "most" media articles about that topic. I watched Tagesschau yesterday (20:00 edition) and they definitely mentioned him. Also checked Spiegel Online and Bild.de and they had him on there too. Considering Süddeutsche Zeitung was the one getting all the information a year ago, I'm sure they mentioned his name as well.
That's by far the most important media outlets in Germany, so not sure what you're reading or watching. RTL II News don't count

Nice quote on what's fishy about this leak:

"The Suddeutsche Zeitung, which received the leak, gives a detailed explanation of the methodology the corporate media used to search the files. The main search they have done is for names associated with breaking UN sanctions regimes. The Guardian reports this too and helpfully lists those countries as Zimbabwe, North Korea, Russia and Syria. The filtering of this Mossack Fonseca information by the corporate media follows a direct western governmental agenda. There is no mention at all of use of Mossack Fonseca by massive western corporations or western billionaires – the main customers. And the Guardian is quick to reassure that “much of the leaked material will remain private.”

What do you expect? The leak is being managed by the grandly but laughably named “International Consortium of Investigative Journalists”, which is funded and organised entirely by the USA’s Center for Public Integrity. Their funders include

Ford Foundation
Carnegie Endowment
Rockefeller Family Fund
W K Kellogg Foundation
Open Society Foundation (Soros)

among many others. Do not expect a genuine expose of western capitalism. The dirty secrets of western corporations will remain unpublished.

Expect hits at Russia, Iran and Syria and some tiny “balancing” western country like Iceland. A superannuated UK peer or two will be sacrificed – someone already with dementia."

Source:
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/04/corporate-media-gatekeepers-protect-western-1-from-panama-leak/

I love whistle blowers to death. If it wasn't for them we would never be able to confirm the obvious.

True. But neither did you, of course

Tagesschau mentioned him, that's correct.

Then you must be quite surprised to hear that the Süddeutsche did NOT mention his name a single time, at least in the big first article when they broke the story.

The initial ZEIT article on the subject on the other hand mentions Poroshenko - but not by name, they just shortly mentioned that "die Präsidenten von Argentinien und der Ukraine" are on the list. On the other hand, that very same ZEIT article is published under a huge picture of Putin, mentioning his name three times and even tagging the whole article with the keyword "Vladimir Putin" - despite the fact that Putin is not even on the lists, just some cello player who apparently played on his daughter's baptism 30 years ago.

Süddeutsche later also published another article on the Panama leaks, titled "Putins best friends", that completely focused on Putin and was published under a huge drawing of Putin. Once again, Poroshenko wasn't mentioned a single time in the article.

And pretty much the same applies to SPIEGEL Online. They have not one, but already at least two articles on the Panama leaks focusing on Putin, so much that they're already mentioning his name in the headline. Neither article mentions Poroshenko though.

But you are right that SpOn also has at least one article on the Panama leaks where Poroshenko's name is actually mentioned.

Anyway, what I'm trying to point out is that the coverage in german media is once again extremely biased, one-sided and Anti-Putin, despite the fact that unlike hundred thousands of people who are actually and personally being incriminated by the Panama leaks, they seem to focus on one person who is not on the list. That's stinking propaganda.

I didn't even know RTL 2 has a news programme. I guess I'm by far not as familiar with BILD and RTL channels as you apparently are.

Simply because Putin is more well known than many of the others that have been uncovered thus far. Even if he isn't directly involved in it.
I'm more surprised that Tagesschau focussed so much on the Icelandic PM yesterday and right now. He's not that unimportant, but come on, it's Iceland (no offense).
Obviously if you want to sell your newspapers, you're going to show a picture and write about someone people know and not some dude from a small island (again no offense).

So true.

I'm actually more excited to see the U.S. Treasury take a stance against inversions but this news might get a little interesting even though most should know that this sort of stuff goes on all the time.

Can't say I'm surprised. But I doubt anything will change. As loads of politicians themselves are involved, we will most likely see some ineffective new laws which do nothing at all but will be sold to us like the holy grail to get some votes.

Well, US citizens are unlikely to appear on the list because the US Gov't signed a data sharing agreement with Panama in 2010, meaning that Panama was no longer a safe place for US citizens to hide their money. Many are still hiding money, of course, but most would have been moved out of Panama years ago.