Quantcast
Dark Souls III Review Thread - Meta: 90

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Dark Souls III Review Thread - Meta: 90

spurgeonryan said:
kind of low for a dark souls game. No?

Not really its 1 point above the original Dark Souls and 1 point below Dark Souls 2, so i would say its right in the average.



Around the Network
estebxx said:
spurgeonryan said:
kind of low for a dark souls game. No?

Not really its 1 point above the original Dark Souls and 1 point below Dark Souls 2, so i would say its right in the average.

1 point above Demon's Souls and 2 under Bloodborne.

90 is pretty much around the average of the whole of those games, so it's doing as expected.



Really hope it stays >=90



e=mc^2

Gaming on: PS4 Pro, Switch, SNES Mini, Wii U, PC (i5-7400, GTX 1060)

is better than DS1?



awesome game



Around the Network
Nautilus said:
Great news!Never played a Souls game, but having plaed Bloodborne, Im definely going to play DS 2 and 3.My only gripe with the franchise, and a big one for me, is the storytelling in general.Why it needs to be so vague and unconclusive when everything is done so perfectly?And its not that Fromsoftware cant tell a story.Eternal Ring is a PS2 game from them and it has a really good story.

The vague story is a part of the charm of the overall package. It really gets you thinking... and who would tell you story in a world where most beings are incapable of speech?



How many dev teams does fromsoftware have? I hope they announce a new game at E3



Any1 beat it yet



Huh, looks like I'll have to get this gem as well. Thanks FS



I'm about almost half way and I think it's better and more difficult than Bloodborne. Still not sure if i'll rate it higher than DeS, DS1, or DS2 though. Too early for that.