Ganon didn't change when Ganodorf was introduce,he was still the same charater that given a human form that isn't changing a character that's adding to it and in WW even though he didn't change into his pig form he was still the same character and yes Fem/Trans Link is a social nararrative and a stupid ideia because the main reason that people want it to happen is just so that there are more women or trans people in games and as nothing to do with the games themselves,let's take Zelda U and give the Hero save the princess story that aparrantly Zelda games love to have and let's make Link a woman in what way does the game change or is freshen up the series apart from "Link has titts now" nothing changes,now with Zelda as the main character things most likely will change since you know Zelda is a different character and not just a guy in drag.So Zelda U won't have a female lead so fing what that doesn't mean that the next one won't have Zelda as the main character.And I will say I'm perfectly fine with more women and tras characters in gaming, but create new ones and give them their own IP don't just change new characters that is just pandering and kinda of isulting if you ask me because you are basically saying that they are not good enough on their own so you'll throw them a bone by giving them an already popular IP.

Samus says you're wrong ...

How can you say he is the same character when Ganondorf in WW was clearly different? He wasn't a pig, therefore he's not the same character. It's as simple as that. Trans Link isn't a stupid idea, it's actually brilliant.

I think your problem is that you haven't read the whole article. So go to the source, Amita explains everything in detail, it's easier that way. No one is saying changing characters is saying they're not good enough. The problem is that Male White Link has been since forever, it's time for a change.

We need to shut down these Marxists/feminists/multiculturalists/immigration lovers from setting the agenda and washing our brains. They don't care for equality or diversity, they just want to destroy the current order, destroy norms and everything that was built by the white man.

So, you read the source? Do you understand now why Transgenders and not another collective (even though they need to be represented) must be the one being represented in the new Zelda game?

And you're wrong. Sheik was definitively a man in OoT (Zelda used magic to change her body, it wasn't just a disguise. The OoT Manga confirmed this), and the transforming into an animal was definitively a move to represent the otherkin collective. Because otherwise wouldn't have made sense that Link was a wolf, wasn't it? They could have simply do what they did in Majora, change his race.

Nintendo definitively aim for the white men population, though I agree that maybe Anita got the age wrong. I do think 15 is way too short, probably mid-20. Still, we're in the same situation.

And she's not biased. She's pointing out the flaws in Nintendo's patriarchal way of thinking. That worker did nothing to deserve being fired. Yet she was kick out regardless.

I think it's too sad that Link has to be a man to be considered the Golden Character of Nintendo. They have the opportunity to demonstrate that your sex isn't what determines the Golden Character thing. Because outside Samus, there's really no diversification in Nintendo's humane-esque Golden Characters.

Be careful, there is a fine line between a bold move and a stupid one.  The Zelda universe is what it is, to change it to that degree even to just show diversity is pointless when there are better options available.

Either A, make the NEXT one focus on Zelda or B, make Link's gender an option.  This is the ONLY way everyone wins.  I don't like playing as a female, period.  Still have not beaten RotTR due to this.  I know many who won't even touch a game with a female lead because, like me, they have no interest in playing as a female.

Samus is a female, never make her male.

Lara is female, should always be that way.

Link is MALE, and should remain so.

Changing an eatablished characters gender is beyond reaching.  As I said however, an option would not bother me at all.  Playing as Zelda or Impa would not be a huge deal, even though I do not prefer it.  If I am forced to play as a female OR transgender Link, I may pass on it altogether.  If this comes to pass, I want a male version of Samus to play as, and I would want him to be the only option as well.

Do you see how stupid this idea is?  Lets make the next Tomb Raider game focus on a male as well while we are at it.  You see where I am going with this...

WW Ganondorf was indeed the same Ganon/Ganondorf from OoT.  Remeber he reverted back to human form when the sages sealed him and this is confirmed by the Zelda Historia.

Samus says you're wrong ...

Why changing something would be pointless? Are you afraid of change, is that it?

Just because you don't like playing as a female, which I guess it's tolerable because it's your taste after all, doesn't mean whole collectives should get punished because you don't want to deal with it. What if we turn every single main character into male? Don't you think there would be a problem there? Sure, you can't please them all, but at least one could try.

It's not a stupid idea. The problem is that you don't like the idea altogether because you personally don't like to play as women. There's the problem. I don't see the problem of turning Lara into a male for diversification, and I know some women would have a problem with it, but it is what it is.

Fair point, but then again, Twilight Princess Ganondorf was different, wasn't he? So my point still stands.

As I said in my previous post, suppirt is better shown through first party new IPs rather than altering existing character.

And as for your second part of that...yes he is the same Ganondorf, just from a different timeline.  ;)