Pavolink said:
What's your opinion on the other 6 movies? |
I love the old trilogy, it has aged surprisingly well with only image updates, it just holds a huge sense of wonder, rather than a huge sense of itself and its massive budget (which was largely the case with the second trilogy).
I did not like The Phantom Menace much at all, mostly due to JarJar and Jake Lloyd being utter shit, it felt like it was meant to be children's movie that tackled heavier subjects such as coup d'etat and betrayal, it's just a weird movie. Attack of the Clones was a lot better, Hayden Christensen is an abomination in it, but I can look past it since the movie itself is a lot better structured and a tad darker, more in line with the themes it presents.
Revenge of the Sith was quite good, Christensen was still terrible but the rest of the cast was rather good, the wrapped it up in a decent way, but unfortunately ruined a few parts of the original trilogy (mostly contextual, like Leia "barely remembering her mother", which is a strange thing to say for someone who lost her mother during their own birth).
The 7th installation simply tried too hard with humor and references, has a rather weak villain (imo, but I know a lot of people disagree), Ridley is far from a terrific actress and the story is half-part wishwash and the other half A New Hope all over again. It also uses some overly cheap writing tricks to cover certain segments (like Han and Chewie "happening upon" the Millennium Falcon in vast expanses of space). There's also huge chunks that are in direct conflict with the lore.