By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - Statistics: VGChartz posting habits from 2008 to now

 

What do you think drives VGChartz activity most?

Console sales 30 36.59%
 
Quality of software 1 1.22%
 
Anticipation of future releases 12 14.63%
 
The quality of the websit... 5 6.10%
 
Frequent data updates 4 4.88%
 
I have no idea 13 15.85%
 
Something else 17 20.73%
 
Total:82
Xxain said:
Im surprised no one mentioned that we virtually have no XBOX team on this site. The major driving force of activity on this site was the PS360 war and all the little bets made on this site.

Then you didn't read my first post in this thread.  But at the very least, it was implied.  Some either joined the "dark side" while others went to live under a rock to lick their wounds.



Around the Network

I've mentioned this before but the 2010/11 and soforth era of mods killed the potential of the site by banning so many xbox fanboys yet not batting an eye lid for the sony fanboys and generally making it a hostile place if your console of choice wasn't a Playstation. Then came the Sony circle jerk era which continued until recently, where the main players were finally banned.

Now the only lively boards seem to be the Nintendo boards and those guys rarely post outside of their section.

People hardly ever talk about actual games anymore either, unless its on an ''official'' board, which isn't very fun. Very few individual threads are created despite a new game releasing every 1 or two weeks. Deus Ex is out next week. No thread in sight.



LivingMetal said:
Xxain said:
Im surprised no one mentioned that we virtually have no XBOX team on this site. The major driving force of activity on this site was the PS360 war and all the little bets made on this site.

Then you didn't read my first post in this thread.  But at the very least, it was implied.  Some either joined the "dark side" while others went to live under a rock to lick their wounds.

The majority left when it was clear that certain rules weren't being inforced when broken by people from certain camps.



Libara said:
LivingMetal said:

Then you didn't read my first post in this thread.  But at the very least, it was implied.  Some either joined the "dark side" while others went to live under a rock to lick their wounds.

The majority left when it was clear that certain rules weren't being inforced when broken by people from certain camps.

Erroneous opinion noted.  Thank you.



LivingMetal said:
Kerotan said:

There's something seriously wrong if that's the reason people won't join.  It's a site for gaming discussion and sales charts / discussion not soft anime porn.  As I said other sites to satisfy that sexual need. 

I think you're missing the point in which Captain_Yuri touched on.  It's more about less intrusive rules and more effective moderating.  Let me give you an example that has happened to me.

My personal stance on how each console company approached the market: Nintendo = caters to their core fans.  Sony = caters to gamers in general.  Microsoft = caters to the widest audience they could possibly appeal to.  I had forgotten the exact wording, but I created a sig based on this personal perception.  Guess what?  I was banned for it.  For an honest expression, I was banned without any substantial objective reasoning.  I suspect it was Kowenicki who reported me because he made snide remarks about my sig right before I was banned. Which leads to my next point.

We've had less participation on these forums because as I mentioned in an earlier post less controversy.  Kowenicki is a known Microsoft supporter and downplayed most anything Sony.  Now that the PS4 is the clear "winner," there's less for most Microsoft supporters to post to promote their console of choice.  One user just mention Nsanity.  The same applied to him.  He always posted pro Microsoft news and negative Sony news during last gen.  This is not the case anymore given the PS4's status.  And this least to my last point.

Call a spade a spade.  If someone is being a bias fanboy, call him out.  So back to "less intrusive rules and more effective moderating," you're banned for saying words like "fanboy."  I'm not condoning namecalling.  But the problem here is that, users have gotten away with the action of fanboyism because intrusive rules that prevent some from objectively posting a point a view allowed others to get away with bias subjectiveness.  This will allow for more posting in the shortrun as fanyboy try to get away with their console agenda.  But this hurts in the long run by discouraging some from posting an objective view point that might offend others for the wrong reasons, thus leading to an undeserved ban or a warning. 

It's getting to the point to where rules are just for the sake of control, and less for the sake growth.

I agree with all that but I'm still against the site being plastered with NSFW images and I'm glad it was cleaned up. 



Around the Network
LivingMetal said:
Libara said:

The majority left when it was clear that certain rules weren't being inforced when broken by people from certain camps.

Erroneous opinion noted.  Thank you.

Childish and lack of any worthwhile addition noted.



Libara said:
LivingMetal said:

Erroneous opinion noted.  Thank you.

Childish and lack of any worthwhile addition noted.

Your previous statement lacked substance.  In contast, my previous posts which is in opposition to your position cited several example to bolster my stance.  This invalidates your position unless you can cite examples instead of vague generalities to the contrary of my posted examples.  So by comparison, your opinion is erroneous at best.  Your initiation of namecalling is of implication of childish behavior.  Thank you once again for your participation.  ;)



LivingMetal said:
Libara said:

Childish and lack of any worthwhile addition noted.

Your previous statement lacked substance.  In contast, my previous posts which is in opposition to your position cited several example to bolster my stance.  This invalidates your position unless you can cite examples instead of vague generalities to the contrary of my posted examples.  So by comparison, your opinion is erroneous at best.  Your initiation of namecalling is of implication of childish behavior.  Thank you once again for your participation.  ;)

I don't need to spend 10 minutes writing an essay of examples. 90% of people on this site know the reasons for the dwindling visits. This is a far from neutral gaming site, from its visitors to its staff. The hypocrisy that can be seen on occasion makes it hard to take it seriously. But i'm done discussing what is already known.



 

Its because admins are too lazy updating sales data which used to happen weekly like clockwork. Not rocket science, theyve left the site to slowly die.