By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Microsoft Was Right, Video Game Discs Are Stupid

Yesterday, I got my hard copy of The Division. Two and a half hours after putting the disc in, I was playing the game. With discs taking almost as long to install as digital downloads, taking up just as much hard drive space, and being much more inconvenient to acquire, I just don’t see the point anymore.

Microsoft was planning to make discs practically irrelevant. The idea was to make the Xbox One almost entirely reliant on digital downloads, and if discs were used, they would essentially just be vessels to install the game, and they would prove you had the “rights” to it.

Year after year, digital revenue continues to climb as more and more players download games from PSN and XBL directly (and of course PC players have been doing this for years).

Now, the process of getting a game on a disc is not simply “pop and play.” Rather, you have to go through a lengthy installation/patching process that can often take nearly as long as it would if you were doing a digital download. But with a digital download, most games allow you to pre-load titles ahead of release, so you don’t have to muck through that on launch day. Not so with discs you acquire on launch day, and you will go through that process regardless.

Most of these games will still take up a huge chunk of your hard drive, even if you’re playing them “from the disc.” And most of the time, despite leaving a load of GBs on your console after an install, you will still have to pop in the disc when you want to play.

The arguments for discs are often directly conflicting with one another. People say they miss having a physical game collection on their shelf they can look at, and they want the ability to play old games when they want. But the other prime argument is that people want the ability to play a game and instantly turn around and pawn it at GameStop, which makes those other two reasons pointless, as you will never actually have a collection of games, if you keep selling them back for new ones.

With how online-connected most games are now, in the future, you may not be able to play them at all with no servers. I’m not saying that’s right, but that’s reality, and it’s a separate sort of problem that has nothing to do with discs vs. digital. Both versions of the game will be affected the same way.

The GameStop argument may be the most compelling, and it always was, but this pawnshop economy seems less and less necessary as time has gone on. As I said, PC gaming has ditched discs for years now, and they’re doing just fine.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2016/03/08/microsoft-was-right-video-game-discs-are-stupid/#47a875fb1521



Around the Network

Give me physical over digital anyday of the week. I'm old school like that. I like having my collection on display.



£37.11 vs £54.99, Digital is stupid and will remain so until they start selling digital copies at £29.99 but I doubt that will ever happen



The reason why a digital only enviorement can be achieved on the PC space is because there are multiple digital distribution platforms, and have to compete with each other. A digital-only console means that the console manufacturer is the only one that can sell games (any games, not just 1st party exclusives, every game has to go through the digital store), and that would definitively evolve into a lot of consumer unfriendly practics.

Also, there are a lot of problems that come with a digital-only option: speed/availability of the internet in your region, space of the hard drives, ownership of the games, DRM...



You know it deserves the GOTY.

Come join The 2018 Obscure Game Monthly Review Thread.

I only have internet with a data cap. Just 5 GB a month. If I used up all of that, I can get another 5 GB - for 20 €. So downloading a 50 GB game? That would be 200 €. Thanks, but no thanks.



Official member of VGC's Nintendo family, approved by the one and only RolStoppable. I feel honored.

Around the Network

We just need card based games - 128 GB in a micro format. Crossing my fingers with the NX.



Retro Tech Select - My Youtube channel. Covers throwback consumer electronics with a focus on "vid'ya games."

Latest Video: Top 12: Best Games on the N64 - Special Features, Episode 7

StuOhQ said:
We just need card based games - 128 GB in a micro format. Crossing my fingers with the NX.

Cartridges are more advanced and cheap now than ever, they must come back.



You know it deserves the GOTY.

Come join The 2018 Obscure Game Monthly Review Thread.

they are annoying at least.
unless you're a collector, the have to less benefits and to much trade offs

physical cheaper? i don't think i could have found the division gold for cheaper than $45, like i bought digital
and can even share with my friend. to $22,5 for a copy of the divison gold edtion...

 

StuOhQ said:
We just need card based games - 128 GB in a micro format. Crossing my fingers with the NX.

correct. i don't see why we would not go back to cards.
they get cheaper and cheapert. the size and speed is getting bigger and faster
and we don't need huge consoles just because of the disktray



walterbates said:

Yesterday, I got my hard copy of The Division. Two and a half hours after putting the disc in, I was playing the game. With discs taking almost as long to install as digital downloads, ...

 

1. Blame MS or Ubi not the physical copy of the game.

2. Maybe it took so longe because of the day one patch (2GB) which should have been downloadad ?

 



I'm the same way I want everything on my PS4 so I don't have to change any disc. With that said some games are so cheap physical that I'll buy it that way sometimes if I know it's a short single player game. Like Uncharted or something like that. Then I just leave that disc in my PS4 and don't have to worry about changing it out. LIke right now I only have uncharted collection and bloodborne physical. Everything else is digital.