Rubio seems a little robotic, but I suspect that voters will prefer that to a candidate who keeps putting their foot in their mouth. Basically, I could see some Trump support flowing to Rubio. And recent polls in NH have Sanders leading Clinton by 14%, with overall momentum being in Sanders' favour.

I don't see any reason that Sanders would underperform the polling in New Hampshire. Didn't he beat the polling expectations in Iowa? And now he's getting into his "home turf".

I almost just want to see trump win, just to see what happens xD anyone kinda curious too? i think hes not that good. Too racist or arrogant and too outspoken almost. but you sure can say it would be quite interesting, from an european point of view

The funny thing is moderates don't like Sanders (kinda like trump). While Sanders can do well in the primaries -- Hillary would do much better in the general. 

That said... the republicans ONLY viable candidate is Rubio. The rest would be curb stomped in the generals.

Sanders and trump won...

Very disappointed in New Hampshire voters... How do you vote for somebody whose catch phrase is "you're fired"...

That's not really true, any of the republican governors that are still running would have a good shot in the general too... They are just even less likely to get through the primary than Rubio...

not even close on that prediction on the republican side.  Trump is miles and miles away from third place.

Polling numbers suggest otherwise. Sanders does better than Clinton when matched against Trump. Sanders is considered "acceptable" by 80% of NH voters in the Democratic primary (remember, that includes Independents that chose to vote on the Democratic side) compared with about 67% for Clinton.

The main thing that Sanders needs to counteract is the idea that he's unelectable. Quite a few people who end up voting for Clinton, according to Opinion polls, do so because they fear that Sanders wouldn't win a general election. It's kind of silly, considering that the only plausible republican candidate that polls as a serious threat if Sanders is the Dem candidate is Rubio (and even then, Sanders has consistently remained ahead on trends). Sanders does strongly against Cruz, Trump, and Bush. The only other two candidates that even warrant specific polling are Carson and Fiorina, and he mops the floor with both.

Hillary does similarly well overall, of course (with a few modifications - she has more trouble with Fiorina than Sanders does), but the point is, polling says Sanders can do fine in the general - especially when you factor in that Clinton currently has a lot more of the money... if Sanders wins the nomination, much of the money currently flowing to Clinton will instead flow to Sanders.

So, based on the current numbers, the split is 58/40 for the Democratic side, based solely on current votes. But if you suppose that, for all counties that have numbers available, the votes remain consistent with where they are now (that is, scaling them up to 100% counted, rather than just counting current votes), it comes out at 60.5/39.5.

Meanwhile, my prediction for the Republicans was significantly wrong. Ah well, you win some, you lose some.

not only that but trump stomped in every category, every income, every age, every level of education. Nearly every category on there. Trump won big with independents too.