He is simply a genius ...

It's been almost too good for him ...

Presidents don't get "Elected" they get "Selected".

I think most signs points toward a brokered convention and in that case, he might loose the nomination against establishment republicans. They know how punished they have been in the last two presidential elections because they haven´t been able to reach out to latinos and african-americans, and trump is like the worst candidate they could ever conjure in that regard. In the general election, he would not even reach 45% of the votes, so that´s good atleast.

Can anything be worse than obama? I don't think so.

In what way has it been bad for you under Obama?

US economy relatively is doing well compared to any other developed country. The stock market has seen large gains overall the last 4-5 years, it's down at the moment, but that happens. Dow Jones Index is at its highest numbers ever the last 4-5 years. National debt has risen regardless of who's in office (Democrat or Republican). 

Trump doesn't win if Latinos and women come out in large numbers to vote. It's not 1955 or even 1985 anymore. 

For example if he loses Florida, which a state with a huge Hispanic population, his chances of the White House become very slim, the electoral votes lost there would be devastating to a Republican bid. 

I think he knows too that a lot of the stuff he says is bullshit, he's saying it because he knows how to manipulate the Republican masses, but he's winning the Republican tickets at the expense of his chance in the main race. Hispanics are going to remember the things he said for a long time, while it won him short term attention, there will be long term blow back from that in a general election. 

That said, I don't think it's that amazing that he's leading. The rest of the Republican field is weak. Cruz is a nut job with no charisma. Bush is a Bush but soft spoken and weak-ish. Rubio is uh ... one of the "They Took ER JERBS" people that Republicans don't like. Ben Carson uh .... yeah. 

*Certainly* ?   Define what makes her a better candidate.  Zero private sector experience. She was given her head start in politics because of who she was sleeping with.  She's not proven to be particularly mentally gifted (Failed her bar exam at first pass) .  Serious questions on her judgement (Libya among other things), serious questions on her character (Outright lies "I was under Sniper Fire"), serious questions on her consistency (Anti Gay marriage, Pro Gay marriage). 

"Experience in politics" means exactly what?   The foundation of this country were people who worked within the private sector and weren't career politicians, they had to establish themselves in their own right and then they went into politics for the good of the country.  They had to live within the very same environment that they claimed to represent.  

He's polling ahead of Hillary currently and that's without any form of 1 on 1 debate.  

Why?  

He was clearly against the entire Iraq occupation.  He publicly has stated he would let Russia handle ISIS.   Conversely,  both Bush's led us into long wars with Iraq and the Middle East.  Obama has bombed more countries than Bush did.  He claimed to be anti-miltiary intervention, but he has clearly proven otherwise.

Trump is mostly an isolationist who wants to make America and only America better.   

lol at Trump living in the same environment he represents. Don't think he's ever lived a day in his life like an average American does. 

He's been all over the map. First he says US will stay out of it, then it's bomb ISIS, then it's let Russia deal with it, then its Russia is getting too powerful, blah, blah, blah.