Isn't 900px60fps overall better than what PS4 and Xb one achieve? PS4 pretty much always hits 1080p, but only for 30fps games. Typically 60fps games are sub 1080, or they are graphically relatively undemanding.

But still, it's not a major technical improvement over PS4 and Xb one, so trying to drag the PS/Xb audience away through having a nottably more powerful machine would clearly not be in their minds if that output turns out to be true.

Yep, and another huge benefit for Nintendo is the sales of their software. Splatoon is going to sell something like 4-5 million, imagine if it were on 3DS in addition to Wii U, it would sell like 8-10 million. The same goes for alot of other games.

Fake written all over.

So you're talking about company philosophy. I could agree there, to an extent. But what I was refering to was consumer base and product line. I don't think selling iPhones, iPads and Macs really compare to selling dedicated home and handheld consoles. They are in different industries selling to different demographics. Saying that Apple gets away with this or gets away with that doesn't really have much weight when we're talking about what Nintendo can do imo. 

Agreed.  Nintendo should just go back to its roots and create a traditional home console.  If they want to add motion control or something different then let that be an add-on and let the consumers choose rather than forcing it upon us.

It could be true, because 

... a PC could handle 1080p/60FPS is cost around 750 ~ 850 USD

So if you want to lower the manufacture cost, then 900p/60FPS is the way to go

Doesn't look like it's fake. Apparently a GFK spokeswomen says she can't comment on these NX slides, if it was fake done by some kid on his computer I'm sure they would just say so.

This almost certainly wasn't supposed to come out.

An R9 380 is more powerful than a PS4 + XB1 GPU combined (3.84 TFLOPS vs. 1.8 + 1.2). That CPU also shreds the PS4/XB1 CPUs. 

So there's no power adapter in the box? I'm calling bullshit just on that.