The fact that the German national TV prepared a material on this topic but decided not to air it and instead to cover the story up is mindblowing. It goes to show just how brainwashed the West is. You are willingly lying about what's happening and doing nothing to stop your own women from getting raped in the name of "tolerance". Fuck such tolerance.

I am even more disgusted, since the last two months German politicians have been interfering in our internal policy, attacking us and claiming that our democracy is in danger. They were even trying to order our President to veto certain bills threatening us with repercussions in the EU and the German President of the European Parliament said that the government that won the elections and got more MPs than any party ever before is committing a coup d'etat (wtf!?). And now we clearly see that it's democracy and freedom of speech in Germany that is threatened, since their government is censoring news that show the real side of their moronic policy. Moreover, they are forcing this policy on other countries.

Muslims (not Arabs) are bad by our standards, because Islam is savage and totally incompatible with our world, our values and way of life - be it Christian or secular ones. They just assaulted and raped dozens of women and guess what - it's allowed by Islam! Yup, for them it's not a sin, it's all fine and dandy. They have Hadiths and verses of the Qu'ran for such a situation that allow them to rape our women: "And all married women are forbidden unto you, save those captives whom your hand possess". It was given in the context of Muslims being hesitant about raping unbeliever women that they captured after battle, if their husbands still lived - Muhammad (or maybe it was the merciful Allah, lol) said it's fine to rape them.

And this was Merkel's response to what happened on New Years Eve.

Seriously, what does it take for her to acknowledge that she done f***ed up? -.-

For the sake of fairness, let's take into consideration the rest of that passage of the Quran shall we?

"And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise."

And this is just one translation of the passage I've come across. There are others: https://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/nora/html/4-24.html

The passage seems to be discussing marriage, not rape.

I agree, and it's good to be fair and to have some knowledge on all sides. I'm not religous at all, and even I understand this.

With that said, the people involved with those crimes should be condemned. Most importantly, the problem is not with the book, it's how you interperate the book.

For the sake of fairness, let's take into consideration the rest of that passage of the Quran shall we?

"And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise."

And this is just one translation of the passage I've come across. There are others: https://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/nora/html/4-24.html

The passage seems to be discussing marriage, not rape.

Probably not the best example, so how about this one? While this passage doesn't talk about rape, if a woman refuses to have sex, the man can punish her since "men are in charge of women".

"Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great."

Here's one that allows intercouse with female captives:

"The apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Quranic verse, "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess". That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period."

There are also several other misogynistic (and I'm not talking about the feminist/SJW version of misogyny) passages in the Quran such as a woman's testimony is worth half of a man's.

and how about these ones from the bible, regarding "men are in charge of women"