By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - What do you think of Donald Trump?

 

What do you think about Trump?

He's amazing! GOD BLESS 'MURICA 88 25.51%
 
Uh... wasn't he a busine... 28 8.12%
 
Ew, of course not! Especi... 123 35.65%
 
I'd like a small loan of a million dollars 106 30.72%
 
Total:345

He's either a genius or an idiot depending on whether or not what he's saying is genuine policy or he's just playing the electorate.

Either way he's going to lose to Hilary.



Around the Network
ReimTime said:

Trump on the bump to get you pumped; America's in a slump but he won't be stumped

He is on the spectrum case, to raise up the white race; hispanics and Muslims gonna get displaced

ISIS on the run, afraid of the pain; from the man with more hairs on his head than cells in his brain

He'll take their oil to fill his mouth; and spit venom 'cross the wall financed by the South

Winning an American election will never be hard,

When all you gotta do is be a fucking retard

 

THANKS OBAMA

 

 

Lol I remember seeing that.

 

Also, it's nice to see both Americans and Non-Americans agreeing with me that Trump sucks. 

Though, it's ironic when people hate trump, but they go on to support Ted Cruz, Ben Carson, Hilary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, etc.

 

I can't believe these people want to run the country I live in.



 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12/22/2016- Made a bet with Ganoncrotch that the first 6 months of 2017 will be worse than 2016. A poll will be made to determine the winner. Loser has to take a picture of them imitating their profile picture.

contestgamer said:
Insidb said:

http://www.pewhispanic.org/2015/11/19/more-mexicans-leaving-than-coming-to-the-u-s/



 


Who cares what it'll cost, the Mexicans will pay for it. Through expensive, limited visa's, tarrifs, etc. What's Mexico going to do about it? We could bomb the living hell out of them if we wanted to and massacre the country in a month, no problem. They'll shut up and pay when Trump tells them to, or he'll make life a living hell for that country and it's elite.

 

And 11 million isn't a molehill - once Trump deports all of those people you better believe a lot of them will try to come back. That's why you need a wall.

 

No, they won't, for several obvious reasons.

1. Mexico doesn't have an extra $56 billion to spend on a wall, and you'd never being able to raise the money you would need through "expensive visa's", because you would have to charge an extra 20,000 dollars per person entering the U.S. from mexico legally each year to afford it, on top of all of the other immigration expenses.

2. Mexico is an ally, and the United States third largest trade partner. Any actions taken that would harm the Mexican economy would also have an adverse effect on the U.S. economy.

3. Mexico would flat out refuse. Any government that agreed to pay for even part of a wall between it and the U.S. would quickly find itself out of power.

 

I'm glad you brought up deportation. Do you know what it would cost to deport the 11.3 million illegal immigrants living in the U.S.? $269 billion in 2012 dollars, or $278 billion in 2015 dollars. So that means that Trumps immigration plan would cost the U.S. 334 billion dollars. Lets hope he has a way to pay for all of this.

Oh wait, his tax plan would reduce revenue by a trillion dollars a year according to the Tax Foundation. It's also important to point out that he'd be deporting a group of people that add $15 billion to Social Security each year while only taking $1 billion a year out of it.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

If he wins it will be just a matter of time before the whole world turn against the US.

That this guy's even considered is a ****ing disgrace.



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

Naum said:
If he wins it will be just a matter of time before the whole world turn against the US.

That this guy's even considered is a ****ing disgrace.

 


Not really. In fact, relations with Russia should improve considerably.

That fact that this guy is considered is actually a blessing. He defeats his opponents in debates by being blunt, deceptive and funny in whichever order he desires. He takes full advantage of the fact that politics is more about entertainment than actual change. His crazy ideas give him more support because people get the impression that voting for him might actually cause change in a very stale political landscape.

The only way for someone to beat the likes of Donald Trump is to be honest and intelligent; two very lacking traits among politicians as most seem to be better suited as actors. Trump rising to power may finally encourage such candidates to speak up and gain more recognition as politics in general is taken more seriously. Because as it stands, making fun of the competition appears to be all that it takes to win the election.



Around the Network
Normchacho said:
contestgamer said:

 


Who cares what it'll cost, the Mexicans will pay for it. Through expensive, limited visa's, tarrifs, etc. What's Mexico going to do about it? We could bomb the living hell out of them if we wanted to and massacre the country in a month, no problem. They'll shut up and pay when Trump tells them to, or he'll make life a living hell for that country and it's elite.

 

And 11 million isn't a molehill - once Trump deports all of those people you better believe a lot of them will try to come back. That's why you need a wall.

 

No, they won't, for several obvious reasons.

1. Mexico doesn't have an extra $56 billion to spend on a wall, and you'd never being able to raise the money you would need through "expensive visa's", because you would have to charge an extra 20,000 dollars per person entering the U.S. from mexico legally each year to afford it, on top of all of the other immigration expenses.

2. Mexico is an ally, and the United States third largest trade partner. Any actions taken that would harm the Mexican economy would also have an adverse effect on the U.S. economy.

3. Mexico would flat out refuse. Any government that agreed to pay for even part of a wall between it and the U.S. would quickly find itself out of power.

 

I'm glad you brought up deportation. Do you know what it would cost to deport the 11.3 million illegal immigrants living in the U.S.? $269 billion in 2012 dollars, or $278 billion in 2015 dollars. So that means that Trumps immigration plan would cost the U.S. 334 billion dollars. Lets hope he has a way to pay for all of this.

Oh wait, his tax plan would reduce revenue by a trillion dollars a year according to the Tax Foundation. It's also important to point out that he'd be deporting a group of people that add $15 billion to Social Security each year while only taking $1 billion a year out of it.

With increased military spending ("the biggest ever") and lost tax revenue, the deficit (as it always does under Republican, supply-side tax codes) will balloon. When the fed needs to recoup these losses, whom do you think they are going to burned with the reactionary tax increases? Will it be the 10%, for whom congress legislates 90% of the time, or the 90%, for whom congress legislates 30% of the time? I think the answer is fairly clear whom would be slammed with higher tax rates than before the new policies were enacted, especially since Reagan tried the same and had to follow with the single largest tax % increases in US history.





Guys, I created this thread to poll demographics: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=212081

Please vote accordingly; thank you.



I don't agree with the majority of his opinions, but one thing I do appreciate is that he's not afraid to speak his mind even if it's something really dumb. I feel that all the other candidates, including the Democrats, act as if they're walking on eggshells. The right to free speech speech does include the right to offend.



Oh I would like to add something else to this thread as to why I like Donald Trump. The fact that the GOP is running negative ads against Donald Trump and them telling me who I should vote for. The more they tell me not to vote for Trump makes me want to vote for him even more. Who are you to tell me who I should and shouldn't vote for? You have the media, analysts, Hillary Clinton, etc saying that it would be the easiest to win against Donald Trump and it would be the hardest to win against Marco Rubio.Why would Hillary Clinton want to tell the public who she can and cannot win against? The glaring answer is to of course mislead the public. If everyone is bombarded with the idea that Trump is weak and would clearly lose against Clinton, then Republican voters may then rally around the candidate that would beat her (Rubio), which so happens to be the exact candidate that the GOP is pushing. Except people like me actually have a brain and see through this garbage. Hillary tells the public that Trump would be the easiest to win against, which of course translates to Trump would be the hardest to win against. 

I of course think the Democratic Party is even worse but I guess you guys must have enjoyed the last Democratic debate on a Saturday night before Christmas...during the exact time of a football game. Oh wait! You can enjoy the next Democratic debate....during football games...no wait two football games...oh this just in...during the playoffs! Oh that was great scheduling.


Or how about this:
Remember when Bernie Sanders had rallies around 18,000 and had around, lets say 33% of the vote? During the same exact time Hillary Clinton would have rallies of about 200-1000 people with 66% of the vote. Those numbers make sense right? Physical people showing their support is a bigger indicator of success than some contrived poll on the news. Just saying...



Jimbo1337 said:

Oh I would like to add something else to this thread as to why I like Donald Trump. The fact that the GOP is running negative ads against Donald Trump and them telling me who I should vote for. The more they tell me not to vote for Trump makes me want to vote for him even more. Who are you to tell me who I should and shouldn't vote for? You have the media, analysts, Hillary Clinton, etc saying that it would be the easiest to win against Donald Trump and it would be the hardest to win against Marco Rubio.Why would Hillary Clinton want to tell the public who she can and cannot win against? The glaring answer is to of course mislead the public. If everyone is bombarded with the idea that Trump is weak and would clearly lose against Clinton, then Republican voters may then rally around the candidate that would beat her (Rubio), which so happens to be the exact candidate that the GOP is pushing. Except people like me actually have a brain and see through this garbage. Hillary tells the public that Trump would be the easiest to win against, which of course translates to Trump would be the hardest to win against. 

I of course think the Democratic Party is even worse but I guess you guys must have enjoyed the last Democratic debate on a Saturday night before Christmas...during the exact time of a football game. Oh wait! You can enjoy the next Democratic debate....during football games...no wait two football games...oh this just in...during the playoffs! Oh that was great scheduling.


Or how about this:
Remember when Bernie Sanders had rallies around 18,000 and had around, lets say 33% of the vote? During the same exact time Hillary Clinton would have rallies of about 200-1000 people with 66% of the vote. Those numbers make sense right? Physical people showing their support is a bigger indicator of success than some contrived poll on the news. Just saying...

 

you mean the same way Donald Trumps staff and him do exactly the same thing agains the other opponents...



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints