I think he wants them to make him a quick buck in short term decisions. Hes an investor himself i think
I think he wants them to make him a quick buck in short term decisions. Hes an investor himself i think
With all the atention this site gives to Patcher, people might start to say we're all tsundere for him.
Pachter is an anagram for PC hater.
Think about it.
He doesn't even play games so why should anyone take his opinion seriously?
Hmmmmmm.... It's true that he hardly ever says something positive for Nintendo...
I think that asking it instead of saying it so bluntly would be better! In case of my post being incomprehensible... I mean this: Does patcher have a hatred against Nintendo? Or rather does patcher feel animosity towards Nintendo?
patronmacabre said: Pachter is an anagram for PC hater. Think about it. |
Shit just got real. It could also be Patch ER, as in the perpetual poor health of PC games that need patches and bug fixes. Mindblowing!
OP: Everyone who is critical of Nintendo is a hater, you should have learned that a long time ago. There are fans and haters, no critics.
But it's not even just Pachter though, he says these outlandish Nintendo is doomed to fail comments because the media as a whole loves to publish negative Nintendo news and they get traffic from the console elitist. Notice that you never hear of anything else that he has to say unless it's about Nintendo...
Mummelmann said:
OP: Everyone who is critical of Nintendo is a hater, you should have learned that a long time ago. There are fans and haters, no critics. |
That sounds like... Oh you nintendo fans stop victimizing Nintendo and calling anyone who is critical towards it, a hater! You should have written it like this: Everyone who is critical of a company is a hater e.t.c. Since hypersensitive fans of all companies (not just the nintendo ones) can label a person who is critical against their favorite company, as a hater! I don't think that at least here the writer does that...
When someone hardly ever says/recognizes a positive thing about something or constantly spins something positive into a negative thing or even fabricating a negative thing or in an irrelavant topic says something negative about it... Can he be considered a critic?
Critical and hater keep up in some cases... Wherefore, how someone expressing its hatred? By being critical of course! How else? However, the criticism by a hater is spiteful, subjective, unjust, misguided, obsessive, repeatitive, ignorant, virulent and biased in contrast with the pure/unfeigned criticism...
He's most certainly not a hater; he's just a terrible analyst.
He looks at what's going on in the industry and makes broad statements and predictions based on what he can see in front of his face (rather than what might actually develop in the future considering all variables). Nintendo is doing badly, so the stuff he says is always going to be negative, because that's as far as his vision goes. If next gen the NX is a huge hit, he'll be making positive--albeit equally shallow--predictions about Nintendo.