Quantcast
Black ops 3 metacritic at 82

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Black ops 3 metacritic at 82

It seems like the console version are fine, but I was trying to play with a friend the PC version and... horrible. Like almost unplayable. Don't buy the PC version if you're thinking about it. Oh, well, maybe you're lucky and it goes fine in your computers, but this is Arkham Knight levels.



Around the Network
poklane said:
Apparently the campaign on PS4 has dynamic resolution and the framerate dips all the way into the 30s :/


Yeah, ignoring the cutscenes which are locked to 30fps, the campaign's frame rate is a mess in spots. Still very playable but it rarely stays at 60fps for long. Hopefully they can put out a patch to address this, but given how bad it is in some spots I am not optimistic.

I can't really tell if the game has dynamic resolution. If it does, then it's not working very well since the frame rate is so irregular (in the campaign).

Aside from that I'm really enjoying it a lot. Worse visuals than last year's COD, but better gameplay and more content.



We have both too and bought both season passes - lol! Activision has to love us! Been a fan since Call of Duty : Modern Warfare. Kinda late to the party, but been a fan ever since. Always been happy with COD. No real complaints.



Volterra_90 said:
It seems like the console version are fine, but I was trying to play with a friend the PC version and... horrible. Like almost unplayable. Don't buy the PC version if you're thinking about it. Oh, well, maybe you're lucky and it goes fine in your computers, but this is Arkham Knight levels.

Arhkam Knight played like shit and looked worse then the console versions on "Everyones" Pc's . BO3 runs bad on "some" peoples pc's. In other words BO3's problems can be fixed with a patch, it would take them redoing most of Arkham Knight to fix that games problems.

Anyway by the time i get BO3 (near xmas) for PC, i expect most of the problems to be fixed.



zero129 said:
Volterra_90 said:
It seems like the console version are fine, but I was trying to play with a friend the PC version and... horrible. Like almost unplayable. Don't buy the PC version if you're thinking about it. Oh, well, maybe you're lucky and it goes fine in your computers, but this is Arkham Knight levels.

Arhkam Knight played like shit and looked worse then the console versions on "Everyones" Pc's . BO3 runs bad on "some" peoples pc's. In other words BO3's problems can be fixed with a patch, it would take them redoing most of Arkham Knight to fix that games problems.

Anyway by the time i get BO3 (near xmas) for PC, i expect most of the problems to be fixed.

True, the game seems to hate Core i5s and Nividia GPUs in general. A simple .ini tweak and setting textures to High (not Ultra) seems to solve most problems



I predict that the Wii U will sell a total of 18 million units in its lifetime. 

The NX will be a 900p machine

Around the Network

it has good reviewer but very bad user reviews on metacritic which i find interresting, espacially on last gen and PC



zero129 said:
Volterra_90 said:
It seems like the console version are fine, but I was trying to play with a friend the PC version and... horrible. Like almost unplayable. Don't buy the PC version if you're thinking about it. Oh, well, maybe you're lucky and it goes fine in your computers, but this is Arkham Knight levels.

Arhkam Knight played like shit and looked worse then the console versions on "Everyones" Pc's . BO3 runs bad on "some" peoples pc's. In other words BO3's problems can be fixed with a patch, it would take them redoing most of Arkham Knight to fix that games problems.

Anyway by the time i get BO3 (near xmas) for PC, i expect most of the problems to be fixed.

I weas about to say this ebcause I've been watching CUlt of Mush's BO3 gameplay and it's running perfect for him as well as Duderandom84.

Also I'm sure they can sort any issues out unlike WB with AK where it was a broken port to the core. lets not taunt this as being exactly like AK though because it's not.



                                       

so many users (not testers) giveing troll scores and probably dont own the game.



Amazing game, deserved score!



Snoopy said:
craighopkins said:
mostly getting 9s. couple click bait websites or haters gave it a 6. gametrailers has a nice video review

Angry Joe will get some hits soon enough lol. He gave the last Cod, Batman and Halo a 6/10. I agree the games have flaw, but COD,Batman and Halo still deserved better imo.


That game did deserve better treatment before it was released, it didn't get it and now WB are offering refunds for the game regardless of time played, how would you give a game which doesn't work 70%+ ? you're talking about scoring a game B+ because of the name or the franchise?



Fancy hearing me on an amateur podcast with friends gushing over one of my favourite games? https://youtu.be/1I7JfMMxhf8