foodfather said: I fail to see whats to be impressed about this. Multuplatform games should remain so. If its by a third party, why should one userbase miss out just because one company is throwing money at the devs??? When MS did it with a couple of franchises last gen, PS3 owners were upset about it. Now Sony seem to be doing this with every game virtually having an hour or sometimes even more exclusive to their console and this is commendable??? This to me is lazy and cheap. |
Nothing lazy or cheap about this. its just business. and one that can be afforded by having the larger install base. Trust me, MS would be all over this if they could. It just makes zero financial sense for MS now to secure or keep these deals cause they lack the install base to back it.
And this "moneyhat" thing people throw around. that's just not how it works. Take Sony for instance. By the time COD releases this year they would have an install base of at least 30M. Now let's say they sell 8M copies of the game on the PS4. That's about $160M in royalties money to Sony. and say they paid Activision $30M in the exclusive content and marketing moneyhat. that still leaves them sitting on $130M in profits with the added benefit of moving more consoles and guaranteeing even more sales for the next installment in the franchise. That extra boost to their install base also means more games are bought in general which translates to more money all round.
Its the easiet and most effective kinda marketing there is. Lastly, you need to understand something.stand I don't get this nonsense of how deals deprive others from getting this or that. If u want to get everything, then have the console(s) that has everything. If whatever exclusive content that comes to a multiplat game matters to you, then that is the version of the game you should buy. and if you don't have the console for it, then buy the console. Which ultimately will mean the money hat served its purpose.