I never understood the love of Crash (real Crash), to be honest. I always thought Spyro (real Spyro) was vastly superior.

But I suppose that's okay. I'm sure no one knows why I would throw fifteen untouched maidens into a volcano for Dark Cloud 3.

I suppose we all have our own definition of "megaton" since it's a made up word anyway but, I really don't consider that a megaton. Getting exclusive games like Minecraft, GTA or COD would be megaton, but not SF. Fighting games are niche.

But wasn't crash teased many times? Come to think of it, there was that while situation with that old video too.

Can't really believe crash will see a new release, Only time will tell of course. Might want to wait before flipping your shit in glee. It also might be wise to keep other hopes in check too
Not that they won't ever happen but you know how disappointment goes. Gets worse every year too.

To be honest it gets a little boring discussing it because generally people have their heads too far in the clouds, Only my opinion of course.

either way it will be nice to have some new news for PS4.

Since when is selling 8+ million units considered niche?

I wouldn't say I've been disappointed. If I were to tell me a little while ago that PS4 would be getting a FF7 Remake, Persona 5, Danganronpa 3, and a new home console Valkyria Chronicles, I wouldn't believe myself even if I showed my past self my time machine.

Give us some vague hints, Tachi.

Mostly about that Level-5 PS4 JRPG. That's the only thing that matters.

Minecraft sold more than 8 million copies on ONE PLATFORM lol. 

There are just too many dusty Sony franchises I'd like to see again...but Crash would top my list. Dark Cloud and Parappa just below that. Gah, trying to suppress the hype...it'll only end in disappointment...but imagine a Crash Bandicoot - 20th Bandiversary-coot. Or something. @_@

I'm sorry but where is anyone seeing any rumour of Crash coming back?

As far as I know, Activision still owns the IP, so if it ever did make a return It would likely be multi-platform anyway unless a deal was struck with Sony. (A deal I would consider anti-consumer)

Only in a situation where Activision would be moving to make a release themselves, and Sony were to swoop in and secure a deal to have it be playstation exclusive, which Is what I would imagine happening.

If Sony were to approach Activision and basically fund the project, then it'd be no different than Bayonetta 2. I'd say Tomb Raider but despite what the developers say, I suspect the game would have released without Microsoft's interaction, especially given the performance of the previous title.

But generally, I consider restricting a game that was initially planned to be multi platform, anti-consumer.
I consider funding a game that would otherwise not have been made, and as a result, the game be exclusive or timed exclusive, acceptable, so long as the arrangement behind it isn't super restrictive.

Personally, i'd rather if Crash was made, that it went multi-platform, as it would sell more, and selling more means a higher probability that they won't just abandon the IP again.