By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Nintendo made potato-chan a midget [Xenoblade X censorship]

I think what the problem is is that Nintendo is deciding for us what to we can and cant see, ala censorship. That doesnt mean that the same people against that are pedophiles.



Muda Muda Muda Muda Muda Muda!!!!


Around the Network
97alexk said:
archer9234 said:
97alexk said:
archer9234 said:
97alexk said:
Goodnightmoon said:

In the moment when to cover a little bit of a 13 year old girl body is called "censorship" and a reason for backlash, you know there is something really fucked up with gaming comunity.

THIS so much this. It feels like people have gotten so anti-censorship its going tooo far in the other direction.

Well. You do dumb decisons in other areas. The dumbness starts to spread.

thats not how it works

Yeah it does. Companies keep doing stupid things like the censorship in the M rated fatal frame. Which is dumb. Eventually, the people hating the censorship, will now hate all forms of alterations in a game, owned by Nintendo, weather it's reasonable or not.

hating on this censorship is preatty stupid.and saying ''reasonable or not'' doesnt make your case stronger

Why is hating on censorship pretty stupid? It can be negative or positive. It's valid critisim. I belive this change is valid. But could of been handled better. During the design phase of the game. And not allow it to begin with. A bikini isn't confusing why it was blocked. Over say in Pokemon BW. Gym leader Lenora's appearance.

At the end of the day. This game is being released world wide. It's a waste, to waste your time censoring it, at this stage. VS shooting it down at the build stage of the game. Were no one would even have known. The most money ends up being foreign sales, anyway.  Fatal Frame is an example of it being implimented stupidly. Same goes for Saints Row IV release in Austrialia. It's stupid for the facts of them being M rated games. Were things that can be offensive and not apporite should be allowed. Because of the age the audiance it's going for. VS this game. That is gonna be aiming for a Teen rating. If this was left it. It would of msot likley forced the game to be M rated.



RenCutypoison said:
Carl2291 said:


Sure.

Dragon's Crown did well too. However, while Im not fully educated on the likes of Neptunia and Disgaea, Im pretty sure neither franchise has 13 Year old children displayed in outfits like that.

To speak on the topic itself... The character is 13 Years old. Why are so many people here against a 13 YO girl having more clothes and not running around in a little bikini? The fuck.


Both have pretty revealing clothings on loli, both like to show them in sexually implicit positions and situations.


Uh, no, not disgaea. At all.



Boberkun said:
Carl2291 said:


13 year old girl.

Google "kids in pools", you'll be shocked.


Theres a reason why I wouldnt look that up.

Theres also a reason why Lin in the OP has a weapon on her back; this has nothing to do with any pool. This is an alternate outfit and theres literally nothing at all wrong with wanting a 13 year old character to have suitable clothing. Especially when that 13 YO girl is supposed to be fighting giant monsters.

So, what exactly is your problem with the change Nintendo made to these outfits?



                            

I honestly don't know how anyone can complain. It's a 15, but really 13, year old girl for God's sake. If you are really that bothered about this...I dunno what to say. Are you really not going to buy the game because of commonsense? This is no way censorship. Sorry, guys.

She looks scarier I guess :-p



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Around the Network

Both designs are pretty bad IMO. The redesigned one is worse though.



It's clearly an improvment, no objection about that.



I think the new outfit is better. Not because of her age, I've seen enough "weird" japanese stuff and don't care about it anymore. But the outfit itself looks better than a plain swimsuit.

BUT! WTF is wrong with her body? Her legs and her head are messed up! Change the outfit if you want, but morphing the character model like that? No thanks!



Once again Censorship for who don't understand it is by the government see Australia. A company changing an outfit on its own game not censorship. Do not see the problem here.

First Fatal Frame now this if you seriously are buying games to get a hard on while you play then you have issues. You want to look at beautiful women go to a strip club, log on to tube8, or even better have your girlfriend/fiancé/wife put on some lingerie and model for you. these are video games. Point of video games is to compete, challenge your hand/eye coordination, make you use your brain. To actually get pissed and throw a tantrum because they cover up the risqué outfit is sad



The character model hasn't been morphed, it's just a bad picture, I've played the game at PGW and don't worry, it's the exact same as the japanese model.