marley said:
Cheaper games and free online make a big difference over the course of a generation. Upgrading a PC after you already own everything is fairly reasonable. I will always need a PC for other tasks. It makes much more sense for me to own a powerful $800-1000 PC - instead of a weaker $400 PC and $400 console. The initial price is essentially the same. It's much more powerful for gaming as well as daily computing. Cheaper games and free online add up over the course of the generation.
|
I don't entirely buy the cheaper games argument for PCs. Sure, one can exclusively buy games during Steam's numerous sales and never pay retail price, but no one's going to argue that the crazy sales are only for old games, or games past the initial release period. Whenever I want to play a big title on PC on the day of release, I have a hard time recalling ever receiving anything more than a 10% discount at best.
But, PC is great for building up a large library of games (more than one will ever have time to play as any big Steam user will attest to).
That said, I've bought stacks of games for console at a small percentage of the original retail price. Inventory sales, re-issued discounted games, used games, even digital store sales allow consumers to do the same thing on consoles.
I had never considered totalling the cost of console hardware with PC hardware to determine value, but If one had $1000 to spend on game hardware it would mean splitting that budget if more than one piece of hardware was purchased.
If PC was my primary gaming platform, I would rather spend $400 on a video card than a console. Of course, each console has platform exclusives making the decision dependent upon individual consumer game interests. There are games in each generation that I couldn't play on even a $10,000+ workstation when they were released for obvious reasons.