padib said:
You're right, I misread your last post and that's why I got annoyed. By 3DS experience I thought meant the 3D effect.
Still, the bottom line is that you value the 3DS at a low place, but you can't say it's more expensive because price and value are two different things. So you can't say things like "With the 3DS it's massively more expensive than the Vita" and expect me to appreciate your point of view. You can say "I value it less than Vita", which is subjective, but you can't say it's more expensive because that's false.
|
It is more expensive to get a library of the more desirable titles for 3DS than it is for Vita. While the retail price of a 2DS is a good note lower than the Vita, for the Vita retail price you get software included.
If you go to the actual proper 3DS systems, in Europe at least, they tend to cost more than Vitas (even the original model was selling for around the same as a Vita bundle with memory card and game mega pack until the N3DS hit). And that is before factoring in how much cheaper games are to buy on the Vita (most of the main Vita titles such as Uncharted, Little Big Planet, Persona 4, Gravity Rush, WipeOut and the likes will set you back around £15 each, the big 3DS titles are generally always £30).
Overall I'd say the Vita is the cheaper of the 2 handheld systems to acquire a decent software library for, even completely disregarding factors such as PS+. Of course, if it's Mario and Luigi you're after, this is a completely m00t point though. I'm also not getting involved in the build quality side as how a system "feels" is pretty subjective too just like people have preferences for different game pads.