Eddie_Raja said:
That CPU is about as strong if not stronger than the PS4's. and that GPU is about half as strong as the X1 -> all in only 15w. Look buddy I know what I bought, and I know why I bought it. I will trade performance for 4x the battery life. I can run every game out, and I can play them for 4 hours straight on battery. Enjoy your 30 minute "Mobile" gaming sessions.
|
The CPU is only stronger in singlethreaded performance (by quite some margin, that's true), but can't come close to outperform the 8 cores of the APU in PS4 or Xbox ONE on code which makes halfway good use of the number of cores present.
The GPU, on the other hand, only comes up to 192 Streaming processors compared to the 768 of an Xbox ONE. While that would suggest around a fourth instead of half as you claim, these numbers are not fully comparable due to different architectures and philosophy. In raw power, the iGPU could reach around one third of the Xbox ONE power, but Intel throttles the integrated graphics part as soon as the TDP goes over target, which is very soon unless there ain't any work on the CPU. Also, only DDR3L 1600 support makes the graphics part choke on the limited bandwith (which is also why AMD's APU can't even shine much in that department against Intel, they are limited by the same bottleneck).
All in all, the iGPU only reaches around 1/5 of the power of an Xbox ONE under real life game rendering workload conditions and the CPU is about 30 percent slower than the one in PS4/Xbox ONE when they're running on all cores. Which is still impressive for a 15W chip, but still not good enough for some more serious gaming.